ArticleNature communications2019
Publisher Correction: Multicolor multiscale brain imaging with chromatic multiphoton serial microscopy.
Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuro-ophthalmological findings of pituitary metastasis: Case series from a single center and review of the literature.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Quantitative characterisation of ipRGCs in retinal degeneration using a computation platform for extracting and reconstructing single neurons in 3D from a multi-colour labeled population.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Affiliation 4 incorrectly read 'University of the Basque Country (Ikerbasque), University of the Basque Country and Donostia International Physics Center, San Sebastian 20018, Spain.'Also, the affiliations of Ignacio Arganda-Carreras with 'IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, 48013, Spain' and 'Donostia International Physics Center (DIPC), San Sebastian, 20018, Spain' were inadvertently omitted.Additionally, the third sentence of the first paragraph of the Results section entitled 'Multicontrast organ-scale imaging with ChroMS microscopy' incorrectly read 'For example, one can choose lambda1 = 850 and lambda2 = 110 nm for optimal two-photon excitation of blue and red chromophores.'. The correct version reads 'lambda2 = 1100 nm' instead of 'lambda2 = 110 nm'. These errors have now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.