Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31073079›Full record

ReviewHaematologica2019

Thrombopoietin receptor agonists: ten years later.

Waleed Ghanima, Nichola Cooper, Francesco Rodeghiero, Bertrand Godeau, James B Bussel

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Haematologica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06009497 (Romiplostim in Combination With Ciclosporin Versus Ciclosporin in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Non-severe Aplastic Anemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 192 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
192citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
26.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06009497 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Romiplostim in Combination With Ciclosporin Versus Ciclosporin in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Non-severe Aplastic Anemia

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking Union Medical College HospitalRan2023 to 2025Enrolled44ConditionsNon Severe Aplastic AnemiaArmsRomiplostim, Ciclosporin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

192 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 374 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Efficacy and Safety of Romiplostim Versus Placebo in Immune Thrombocytopenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

132 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Waleed GhanimaDepartments of Medicine, Hematology-Oncology and Research, Østfold Hospital Trust, Norway waleed.ghanima@SO-HF.no.
Nichola CooperDepartment of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College, London, UK.
Francesco RodeghieroHematology Project Foundation and Department of Cell Therapy and Hematology, S. Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.
Bertrand GodeauDepartment of Internal Medicine, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, UPEC, Créteil, France.
James B BusselDepartment of Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCornell University · USImperial College London · GBOspedale San Bortolo · ITØstfold Hospital Trust · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The two thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA), eltrombopag and romiplostim, were licensed in the US for treatment of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) in 2008 and, since then, their use has progressively increased around the world; they are currently used in more than 100 countries. The six largest randomized controlled trials conducted in ITP have used one of these two agents. All studies have demonstrated a platelet response rate between 50-90%, depending on the criteria used, with good safety and tolerability. TPO-RA were shown to be effective in reducing bleeding and the need for concomitant or rescue medication. Many other investigations of their mechanism of effect, prospective and retrospective trials, and studies focusing on toxicity have been performed widening our knowledge of these two agents. Initial concerns on issues such as myelofibrosis have not been confirmed. Only a small number of patients develop moderate-severe reticulin fibrosis and/or collagen fibrosis; however, these are usually reversed after discontinuation of TPO-RA. Studies indicate, however, that TPO-RA may increase the risk of venous thromboembolism. Both TPO-RA are currently approved in patients with chronic ITP aged >1-year who are refractory to at least one other treatment. Eltrombopag has acquired two additional indications: severe aplastic anemia refractory to first-line treatment and hepatitis C patients undergoing treatment with interferon-ribavirin. Despite these wide-ranging studies, important questions still need to be answered. This summary review on TPO-RA will summarize what is known regarding efficacy in ITP, evaluate safety concerns in more depth, and focus on the questions that remain.

Indexed as

AnimalsBenzoatesBiomarkersBlood CoagulationClinical Trials as TopicDisease SusceptibilityHumansHydrazinesPurpura, Thrombocytopenic, IdiopathicPyrazolesReceptors, FcReceptors, ThrombopoietinRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSignal TransductionThrombopoietinTreatment OutcomeBenzoatesBiomarkerseltrombopagHydrazinesPyrazolesReceptors, FcReceptors, ThrombopoietinRecombinant Fusion ProteinsromiplostimThrombopoietin

Identifiers

PMID31073079
PMCPMC6545830
OpenAlexW2944617176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.