Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31073021›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2019

Conformity to Clinical Practice Guidelines at Initial Management in Adult Soft Tissue and Visceral Tumors since the Implementation of the NetSarc Network in Eastern France.

Justine Gantzer, Antonio Di Marco, Thibaut Fabacher, Noelle Weingertner, Jean-Baptiste Delhorme, David Brinkert, Guillaume Bierry, Jean-Pierre Ghnassia, Jérémie Jégu, Jean-Emmanuel Kurtz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Justine GantzerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France justine.gantzer@chru-strasbourg.fr.
Antonio Di MarcoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Thibaut FabacherDepartment of Public Health, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Noelle WeingertnerDepartment of Pathology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Jean-Baptiste DelhormeDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
David BrinkertDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Guillaume BierryDepartment of Radiology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Jean-Pierre GhnassiaDepartment of Pathology, Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France.
Jérémie JéguDepartment of Public Health, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Jean-Emmanuel KurtzDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSoft tissue sarcomas are rare and heterogenous tumors that are hard to diagnose. The aim of this study was to evaluate local practices and conformity to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for their initial diagnostic management. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients were carriers of a soft tissue or visceral tumor, presented at a sarcoma tumor board (STB) between 2010 and 2016. Conformity to CPGs was evaluated using ten criteria designed for this purpose. Associations between different factors and conformity to composite criteria, reflecting the three main diagnostic steps (imaging, biopsy and histological report) were analyzed.

resultsA total of 643 patients were included. A preoperative tumor imaging assessment and a biopsy were performed according to CPGs in 80.8% and 36.8% of the cases, respectively. When done, the first surgical resection was R0 in 30.3% of cases, R1 in 28.6%, and R2 in 10.9%. The rest of the operated patients with sarcoma had a second surgical excision (11.4%), an intraoperative fragmentation (4.3%), or margins were unknown (14.4%). Six of the ten quality criteria presented a conformity rate higher than 70%. Two criteria with a conformity rate lower than 20% were the most controversial: presentation at a STB before biopsy and freezing of a tumor fragment. A multivariate analysis revealed that the common predictor of nonconformity to composite criteria was the initial management in a nonexpert center.

conclusionInitial diagnostic management requires improvement, especially outside of specialized centers. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This article supports the essential need to refer patients with soft tissue tumors to specialized centers to improve the management of sarcomas beginning at the diagnostic phase. Indeed, the reported data were very similar to those already described at the national level of the NetSarc network and indicate the necessity to keep raising awareness about this simple issue: early referral to reference centers will save lives.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCancer Care FacilitiesDisease ManagementFemaleFranceGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicRetrospective StudiesSarcomaSoft Tissue NeoplasmsConformity to clinical guidelinesDiagnostic managementSarcomasSoft tissue tumors

Identifiers

PMID31073021
PMCPMC6693707
OpenAlexW2944092978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.