Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31072973›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2019

The Continued Rise in Professional Use of Social Media at Scientific Meetings: An Analysis of Twitter Use during the ASNR 2018 Annual Meeting.

G D'Anna, M M Chen, J L McCarty, A Radmanesh, A L Kotsenas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2019
    Article
  5. AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2019
    Article
  6. Hardly a Tweet Storm.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

G D'AnnaFrom the Neuroradiology Unit (G.D.A.), Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Monza Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza, Italy gennaro.danna@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9890-9359
M M ChenDepartment of Radiology (M.M.C.), University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0002-3274-2653
J L McCartyDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging (J.L.M.), University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, Houston, Texas.ORCID 0000-0001-9533-6524
A RadmaneshDepartment of Radiology (A.R.), New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-8581-2600
A L KotsenasDepartment of Radiology (A.L.K.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-0463-955X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Professional use of social media continues to increase. We analyzed Twitter use of our own American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR) 2018 annual meeting, reviewing all Twitter posts (3020 tweets from 523 participants) containing the hashtag #ASNR18 from May 21, 2018, to June 12, 2018, extracting the transcripts from Symplur. Then, each tweet was categorized by the role of user, type of tweet, and topic. The dominant user category was neuroradiologist/radiologist (63%). The keynote address, "The Radiology Renaissance: Shaping the Future of Healthcare," presented by Andy DeLao @Cancergeek was the most frequently tweeted topic (10%). Comment on a session was the major type of tweet. When we compared the data with a similar analysis in 2014, our data analysis showed a growth in the use of Twitter in only 4 years.

Indexed as

Congresses as TopicHumansRadiologySocial MediaSocieties, Medical

Identifiers

PMID31072973
PMCPMC7028597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.