Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31072907›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Context-Based Facilitation in Visual Word Recognition: Evidence for Visual and Lexical But Not Pre-Lexical Contributions.

Susanne Eisenhauer, Christian J Fiebach, Benjamin Gagl

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susanne EisenhauerDepartment of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60323 Frankfurt am Main, Germany eisenhauer@psych.uni-frankfurt.de.
Christian J FiebachDepartment of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60323 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0827-1721
Benjamin GaglDepartment of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60323 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2339-6293
Goethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Word familiarity and predictive context facilitate visual word processing, leading to faster recognition times and reduced neuronal responses. Previously, models with and without top-down connections, including lexical-semantic, pre-lexical (e.g., orthographic/phonological), and visual processing levels were successful in accounting for these facilitation effects. Here we systematically assessed context-based facilitation with a repetition priming task and explicitly dissociated pre-lexical and lexical processing levels using a pseudoword (PW) familiarization procedure. Experiment 1 investigated the temporal dynamics of neuronal facilitation effects with magnetoencephalography (MEG;

Indexed as

ReadingAdolescentAdultCerebral CortexFemaleHumansMagnetoencephalographyMalePattern Recognition, VisualPsycholinguisticsReaction TimeRecognition, PsychologyRepetition PrimingTime FactorsYoung Adultcontextmagnetoencephalographypredictive codingpseudoword learningrepetition primingword recognition

Identifiers

PMID31072907
PMCPMC6509571
OpenAlexW2940279639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.