Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31072863›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Parental experiences of end of life care decision-making for children with life-limiting conditions in the paediatric intensive care unit: a qualitative interview study.

Sarah Mitchell, Jenna L Spry, Emma Hill, Jane Coad, Jeremy Dale, Adrian Plunkett

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Family Caregivers' Experiences of Services for Children With Medical Complexity: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Children's complex health: Maternal experiences of care and decision making.Journal of child health care : for professionals working with children in the hospital and community · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah MitchellWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1477-7860
Jenna L SpryPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6249-4881
Emma HillPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Jane CoadSchool of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, UK.
Jeremy DaleWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, West Midlands, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9256-3553
Adrian PlunkettPaediatric Intensive Care Unit, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Warwick · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2014-07-065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo provide an in-depth insight into the experience and perceptions of bereaved parents who have experienced end of life care decision-making for children with life-limiting or life-threatening conditions in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

designAn in-depth qualitative interview study with a sample of parents of children with life-limiting or life-threatening conditions who had died in PICU within the previous 12 months. A thematic analysis was conducted on the interview transcripts.

settingA PICU in a large National Health Service (NHS) tertiary children's hospital in the West Midlands, UK.

participants17 parents of 11 children who had died in the PICU.

resultsFive interconnected themes were identified related to end of life care decision-making:(1) parents have significant knowledge and experiences that influence the decision-making process.(2) Trusted relationships with healthcare professionals are key to supporting parents making end of life decisions.(3) Verbal and non-verbal communication with healthcare professionals impacts on the family experience.(4) Engaging with end of life care decision-making can be emotionally overwhelming, but becomes possible if parents reach a 'place of acceptance'.(5) Families perceive benefits to receiving end of life care for their child in a PICU. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The death of a child is an intensely emotional experience for all involved. This study adds to the limited evidence base related to parental experiences of end of life care decision-making and provides findings that have international relevance, particularly related to place of care and introduction of end of life care discussions. The expertise and previous experience of parents is highly relevant and should be acknowledged. End of life care decision-making is a complex and nuanced process; the information needs and preferences of each family are individual and need to be understood by the professionals involved in their care.

Indexed as

Decision MakingIntensive Care Units, PediatricProfessional-Family RelationsAdolescentAttitude to DeathBereavementChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInterviews as TopicMaleParental ConsentParentsadvance care planningdecision makingpaediatric palliative carepalliative carepediatrics

Identifiers

PMID31072863
PMCPMC6528052
OpenAlexW2944575236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.