Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31072755›Full record

ArticleWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health

Women's Participation in Research on Intimate Partner Violence: Findings on Recruitment, Retention, and Participants' Experiences.

Melissa E Dichter, Anneliese E Sorrentino, Terri N Haywood, Anaïs Tuepker, Summer Newell, Meagan Cusack, Gala True

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa E DichterCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: mdichter@upenn.edu.
Anneliese E SorrentinoCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Terri N HaywoodCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Anaïs TuepkerCenter to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon; Department of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Summer NewellCenter to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC), VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon.
Meagan CusackCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Gala TrueSouth Central Mental Illness, Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System, New Orleans, Louisiana; Section of Community and Population Medicine, LSU School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Philadelphia VA Medical Center · USOregon Health & Science University · USSoutheast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System · USVA Portland Health Care System · US

Funding

HSRD VA I01 HX001905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearch on intimate partner violence (IPV) faces unique challenges to recruitment and retention. Little is known about successful strategies for recruiting and retaining in research women who have experienced IPV, and their experiences of research participation. PURPOSE: This article presents findings on recruitment, retention, and research participation experiences from a longitudinal observational study of IPV among women receiving care through the Veterans Health Administration.

methodsAdministrative tracking data were analyzed to identify strengths, challenges, and outcomes of multiple recruitment strategies for an observational study of women patients who had experienced past-year IPV. Qualitative interviews with a purposively selected subset of the larger sample were used to identify motivations for and experiences of study participation.

resultsOf the total sample (N = 169), 92.3% were recruited via direct outreach by the research team (63.3% via letter, 29.0% in person), compared with provider or patient self-referral (3.6% and 4.1%, respectively); 88% returned for a follow-up assessment. In qualitative interviews (n = 50), participants expressed a desire to help others as a primary motivation for study participation. Although some participants experienced emotional strain during or after study visits, they also expressed perceiving value in sharing their experiences, and several participants found the experience personally beneficial. Participants expressed that disclosure was facilitated by interviewers' empathic and neutral stance, as well as the relative anonymity and time-limited nature of the research relationship.

conclusionsDirect outreach to women Veterans Health Administration patients to participate in research interviews about IPV experience was feasible and effective, and proved more fruitful for recruitment than reliance on provider or patient self-referral. Women who have experienced IPV may welcome opportunities to contribute to improvements in care through participation in interviews.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansIntimate Partner ViolenceMiddle AgedResearch SubjectsUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsVeterans

Identifiers

PMID31072755
PMCPMC10077872
OpenAlexW2943907002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.