ArticleJournal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia2019
Impact of age on cerebral aneurysm occlusion after flow diversion.
Article in Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient's Age Impact on Stroke Risk and Intracranial Aneurysm Occlusion: SCENT Flow Diverter Study-A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial on Large and Giant Aneurysms.Neurosurgery practice · 2026Article
- The Woven EndoBridge for Wide-Neck Bifurcation Aneurysms: A Retrospective Study of 120 Cases with Expanded Indications Covering All Subtypes.Neurointervention · 2025Article
- Intraprocedural Technical Events During Flow Diverter Implantation Partially Mediate the Effect of Age on Aneurysm Occlusion.Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Unruptured cerebral aneurysms in elderly patients: key challenges and management.Annals of medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of the pipeline embolization device (PED) in different patient age groups with unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA). All patients with UIA treated with the PED between 2011 and 2017 were included. Based on their age, patients were trichotomized to: young (≤45 years), middle-aged (46 to <65 years) and older (≥65 years) groups. Patient's vascular risk factors, presenting symptoms and mRS on admission were collected. Follow-up imaging was evaluated for presence/absence of aneurysm occlusion. Clinical outcome at discharge, 3-9 months and 12-18 months was also documented when available. A total of 260 patients harboring 307 aneurysms (young = 57, middle-age = 144 and older age group = 64). Most aneurysms were located in the anterior circulation (94.8%). Overall morbidity and mortality was 2.3% each (6/260). At 3-9 months near complete to complete aneurysm occlusion was 82.5% (47/57) in the young age group, 82.6% (100/121) in the middle age, and 70.2% (40/57) in the older age group. At 12-18-month, near complete to complete occlusion was 100% in the young age group (32/32), 91.4% (64/70) in the middle age, and 78.4% (29/37) in the older age group. After adjustment for potential confounders, older age patients less frequently achieved near complete to complete occlusion by 3 years than younger subjects (p = 0.009, HR 1.34 95%, CI 1.08-1.66). Our results indicate feasibility and safety of PED across different age groups. Further study is required to determine age-related factors relating to aneurysm occlusion after PED to improve outcome and patient counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.