Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31072453›Full record

ArticleSexual health2019

Factors influencing sexually transmissible infection disclosure to male partners by HIV-positive pregnant women in Pretoria townships, South Africa: a qualitative study.

Joseph Daniels, Lindsey De Vos, Winta Mogos, Dawie Olivier, Simukai Shamu, Maanda Mudau, Jeffrey Klausner, Andrew Medina-Marino

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexual health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. PersistentInternational journal of STD & AIDS · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Joseph DanielsCharles Drew University, 1731 E. 120th Street, Los Angeles, CA 90059, USA; and Corresponding author. Email: josephdaniels@cdrewu.edu.
Lindsey De VosFoundation for Professional Development, 173 Mary Road, Die Wilgers, Pretoria, 0184, South Africa.
Winta MogosProgram in Public Health, 653 E. Peltason Drive, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92617, USA.
Dawie OlivierFoundation for Professional Development, 173 Mary Road, Die Wilgers, Pretoria, 0184, South Africa.
Simukai ShamuFoundation for Professional Development, 173 Mary Road, Die Wilgers, Pretoria, 0184, South Africa.
Maanda MudauFoundation for Professional Development, 173 Mary Road, Die Wilgers, Pretoria, 0184, South Africa.
Jeffrey KlausnerUCLA CARE Center, 1399 S. Roxbury Drive, Suite 100, Los Angeles, CA 90035, USA.
Andrew Medina-MarinoFoundation for Professional Development, 173 Mary Road, Die Wilgers, Pretoria, 0184, South Africa.
Foundation for Professional Development · ZACharles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science · USUCLA Health · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

Pilot Study of STI Screening and Treatment for PMTCTR21HD084274 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI KLAUSNER, JEFFREY DAVID, MEDINA-MARINO, ANDREW · 2015 to 2016
$352k
Investigating the acceptability and feasibility of home-based TB testing of household contacts using a new, mobile point-of-care technologyR21EB023679 · NIBIB · FOUNDATION FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT · PI MEDINA-MARINO, ANDREW · 2016 to 2017
$297k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB023679NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD084274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Sexually transmissible infections (STI) may increase the risk of mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HIV. However, diagnostic testing and targeted treatment of STI (STI-TT) during pregnancy is not standard care in South Africa.

methodsA qualitative study was nested in a STI-TT intervention to investigate motivating and enabling factors associated with STI test results disclosure to sexual partners. A semi-structured interview protocol covered partner communication, HIV and STI disclosure, financial security and relationships dynamics. Interviews were conducted in participants' preferred language, audio-recorded, transcribed into English and analysed using a constant comparison approach. The study was conducted in two townships in Pretoria, South Africa.

resultsTwenty-eight HIV-positive pregnant women were interviewed. Based on the interviews, two disclosure experiences for women were identified - those with vulnerable experiences and those with self-enabling experiences within their partnerships. Vulnerable women discussed intimate partner violence (IPV) and fear of relationship dissolution as factors influencing their test result disclosure. Self-enabled women discussed their ability to talk with their partners about STI and HIV infections and the influence of multiple concurrent partnerships in the acquisition of HIV/STIs. Both groups of women were concerned about men's health behaviours, and all cited the health and development of their unborn child as a key motivator for test result disclosure.

conclusionsImproved counselling and support for pregnant women to disclose their STI test results to their partners may improve the impact of STI diagnostic testing during pregnancy by improving partner treatment uptake and thus reducing the risk of re-infection.

Indexed as

DisclosureHIV InfectionsPregnancy Complications, InfectiousSexual PartnersAdultFemaleHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalIntimate Partner ViolencePregnancyPrenatal CareQualitative ResearchSexually Transmitted DiseasesSouth AfricaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31072453
PMCPMC8428536
OpenAlexW2944051557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.