Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31072389›Full record

SynthesisBMC ophthalmology2019

Efficacy and safety of interventions to control myopia progression in children: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Efthymia Prousali, Anna-Bettina Haidich, Andreas Fontalis, Nikolaos Ziakas, Periklis Brazitikos, Asimina Mataftsi

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Management of myopia: a mini-review.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Childhood Myopia Part I: Contemporary Treatment Options.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Review
  11. Topical review: Potential mechanisms of atropine for myopia control.Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Efthymia Prousali2nd Department of Ophthalmology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Anna-Bettina HaidichDepartment of Hygiene, Social-Preventive Medicine and Medical Statistics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Andreas FontalisDepartment of Hygiene, Social-Preventive Medicine and Medical Statistics, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Nikolaos Ziakas2nd Department of Ophthalmology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Periklis Brazitikos2nd Department of Ophthalmology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Asimina Mataftsi2nd Department of Ophthalmology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece. amatafts@auth.gr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4238-022X
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki · GR

Funding

State Scholarships Foundation 2018-050-0502-12431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMyopia is a common visual disorder with increasing prevalence. Halting progression of myopia is critical, as high myopia can be complicated by a number of vision-compromising conditions.

methodsLiterature search was conducted in the following databases: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE) and Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) database. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses investigating the efficacy and safety of multiple myopia interventions vs control conditions, were considered. Methodological quality and quality of evidence of eligible studies were assessed using the ROBIS tool and GRADE rating. The degree of overlapping of index publications in the eligible reviews was calculated with the corrected covered area (CCA).

resultsForty-four unique primary studies contained in 18 eligible reviews and involving 6400 children were included in the analysis. CCA was estimated as 6.2% and thus considered moderate. Results demonstrated the superior efficacy of atropine eyedrops; 1% atropine vs placebo (change in refraction: -0.78D, [- 1.30 to - 0.25] in 1 year), 0.025 to 0.05% atropine vs control (change in refraction: -0.51D, [- 0.60 to - 0.41] in 1 year), 0.01% atropine vs control (change in refraction: -0.50D, [- 0.76 to - 0.24] in 1 year). Atropine was followed by orthokeratology (axial elongation: - 0.19 mm, [- 0.21 to - 0.16] in 1 year) and novel multifocal soft contact lenses (change in refraction: -0.15D, [- 0.27 to - 0.03] in 1 year). As regards adverse events, 1% atropine induced blurred near vision (odds ratio [OR] 9.47, [1.17 to 76.78]) and hypersensitivity reactions (OR 8.91, [1.04 to 76.03]).

conclusionsExisting evidence has failed to convince doctors to uniformly embrace treatments for myopic progression control, possibly due to existence of some heterogeneity, reporting of side effects and lack of long-term follow-up. Research geared towards efficient interventions is still necessary.

Indexed as

ChildContact Lenses, HydrophilicDisease ProgressionEyeglassesHumansMydriaticsMyopia, DegenerativeRisk Reduction BehaviorMydriaticsAnti-muscarinic agentsChildrenLensesMyopiaRefractive errorVision

Identifiers

PMID31072389
PMCPMC6506938
OpenAlexW2943981724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.