Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31072059›Full record

ReviewPolymers2019

Recent Applications of Chitin- and Chitosan-Based Polymers in Plants.

Massimo Malerba, Raffaella Cerana

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 152 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Spent Brewer's Yeast Lysis Enables aInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Anthracnose of Onion (Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Managingtomato bacterial wilt by suppressingFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Massimo MalerbaDipartimento di Biotecnologie e Bioscienze, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy. massimo.malerba@unimib.it.
Raffaella CeranaDipartimento di Scienze dell'Ambiente e della Terra, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy. raffaella.cerana@unimib.it.
University of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the use of complex molecules based on the natural biopolymer chitin and/or on its deacetylated derivative chitosan has resulted in great advantages for many users. In particular, industries involved in the production of drugs, cosmetics, biotechnological items, and food have achieved better results using these particular molecules. In plants, chitin- and chitosan-based molecules are largely used as safe and environmental-friendly tools to ameliorate crop productivity and conservation of agronomic commodities. This review summarizes the results of the last two years on the application of chitin- and chitosan-based molecules on plant productivity. The open questions and future perspectives to overcome the present gaps and limitations are also discussed.

Indexed as

chitinchitosandefense responsesnanoparticlespesticidesplant growth

Identifiers

PMID31072059
PMCPMC6572233
OpenAlexW2944801701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.