Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31072058›Full record

ArticleViruses2019

Environmental Surveillance for Poliovirus and Other Enteroviruses: Long-Term Experience in Moscow, Russian Federation, 2004⁻2017.

Olga E Ivanova, Maria S Yarmolskaya, Tatiana P Eremeeva, Galina M Babkina, Olga Y Baykova, Lyudmila V Akhmadishina, Alexandr Y Krasota, Liubov I Kozlovskaya, Alexander N Lukashev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Structured Ethical Review for Wastewater-Based Testing.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Biomarker selection strategies based on compound stability in wastewater-based epidemiology.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Olga E IvanovaFederal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Chumakov Federal Scientific Centre for Research and Development of Immune-and-Biological Products of the Russian Academy of Sciences" (FSBSI "Chumakov FSC R&D IBP RAS"), 108819 Moscow, Russia. ivanova_oe@chumakovs.su.
Maria S YarmolskayaFederal Budget Institution of Health of Rospotrebnadzor "Center for Hygiene and Epidemiology in Moscow", Moscow 129626, Russia. mashay@bk.ru.
Tatiana P EremeevaFederal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Chumakov Federal Scientific Centre for Research and Development of Immune-and-Biological Products of the Russian Academy of Sciences" (FSBSI "Chumakov FSC R&D IBP RAS"), 108819 Moscow, Russia. poliom_ldms@mail.ru.
Galina M BabkinaFederal Budget Institution of Health of Rospotrebnadzor "Center for Hygiene and Epidemiology in Moscow", Moscow 129626, Russia. poliolab@yandex.ru.
Olga Y BaykovaFederal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Chumakov Federal Scientific Centre for Research and Development of Immune-and-Biological Products of the Russian Academy of Sciences" (FSBSI "Chumakov FSC R&D IBP RAS"), 108819 Moscow, Russia. baykovaaa@mail.ru.
Lyudmila V AkhmadishinaSechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia. akhludmilav@gmail.com.
Alexandr Y KrasotaFederal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Chumakov Federal Scientific Centre for Research and Development of Immune-and-Biological Products of the Russian Academy of Sciences" (FSBSI "Chumakov FSC R&D IBP RAS"), 108819 Moscow, Russia. krasota@belozersky.msu.ru.
Liubov I KozlovskayaFederal State Budgetary Scientific Institution "Chumakov Federal Scientific Centre for Research and Development of Immune-and-Biological Products of the Russian Academy of Sciences" (FSBSI "Chumakov FSC R&D IBP RAS"), 108819 Moscow, Russia. akhludmilav@gmail.com.
Alexander N LukashevSechenov First Moscow State Medical University, 119991 Moscow, Russia. alexander_lukashev@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polio and enterovirus surveillance may include a number of approaches, including incidence-based observation, a sentinel physician system, environmental monitoring and acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) surveillance. The relative value of these methods is widely debated. Here we summarized the results of 14 years of environmental surveillance at four sewage treatment plants of various capacities in Moscow, Russia. A total of 5450 samples were screened, yielding 1089 (20.0%) positive samples. There were 1168 viruses isolated including types 1-3 polioviruses (43%) and 29 different types of non-polio enteroviruses (51%). Despite using the same methodology, a significant variation in detection rates was observed between the treatment plants and within the same facility over time. The number of poliovirus isolates obtained from sewage was roughly 60 times higher than from AFP surveillance over the same time frame. All except one poliovirus isolate were Sabin-like polioviruses. The one isolate was vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2 with 17.6% difference from the corresponding Sabin strain, suggesting long-term circulation outside the scope of the surveillance. For some non-polio enterovirus types (e.g., Echovirus 6) there was a good correlation between detection in sewage and incidence of clinical cases in a given year, while other types (e.g., Echovirus 30) could cause large outbreaks and be almost absent in sewage samples. Therefore, sewage monitoring can be an important part of enterovirus surveillance, but cannot substitute other approaches.

Indexed as

EnterovirusEnterovirus InfectionsEnvironmental MonitoringHumansMoscowPoliomyelitisPoliovirusSewageSewageEnterovirusenterovirus surveillanceenvironmental surveillancepoliovirussewage

Identifiers

PMID31072058
PMCPMC6563241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.