Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31071978›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2019

Text Mining Analysis to Evaluate Stakeholders' Perception Regarding Welfare of Equines, Small Ruminants, and Turkeys.

Emanuela Dalla Costa, Vito Tranquillo, Francesca Dai, Michela Minero, Monica Battini, Silvana Mattiello, Sara Barbieri, Valentina Ferrante, Lorenzo Ferrari, Adroaldo Zanella and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Housing and Management of Turkey Flocks in Canada.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Emanuela Dalla CostaDipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy. emanuela.dallacosta@unimi.it.ORCID 0000-0002-5037-3759
Vito TranquilloIstituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell'Emilia Romagna-Sezione diagnostica di Bergamo, 24125 Bergamo, Italy. vito.tranquillo@izsler.it.ORCID 0000-0002-8121-5956
Francesca DaiDipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy. francesca.dai@unimi.it.ORCID 0000-0002-2983-4880
Michela MineroDipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy. michela.minero@unimi.it.ORCID 0000-0001-8285-5501
Monica BattiniDipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy. monica.battini@unimi.it.ORCID 0000-0002-6134-7759
Silvana MattielloDipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy. silvana.mattiello@unimi.it.ORCID 0000-0003-1885-949X
Sara BarbieriDipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy. sara.barbieri@unimi.it.ORCID 0000-0003-3628-2129
Valentina FerranteDipartimento di Scienze e Politiche Ambientali, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy. valentina.ferrante@unimi.it.ORCID 0000-0002-8745-6777
Lorenzo FerrariDipartimento di Scienze e Politiche Ambientali, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milano, Italy. lorenzo.ferrari@unimi.it.
Adroaldo ZanellaDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine and Animal Health (VPS), University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP 05508-270, Brazil. adroaldo.zanella@usp.br.
Elisabetta CanaliDipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali - Produzione, Università degli Studi di Milano, Territorio, Agroenergia, 20133 Milano, Italy. elisabetta.canali@unimi.it.

Funding

Seventh Framework Programme 266213
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Welfare of animals significantly depends on how stakeholders perceive their needs and behave in a way to favor production systems that promote better welfare outcomes. This study aimed at investigating stakeholders' perception of the welfare of equines, small ruminants, and turkeys using text mining analysis. A survey composed by open-ended questions referring to different aspects of animal welfare was carried out. Text mining analysis was performed. A total of 270 surveys were filled out (horses = 122, sheep = 81, goats = 36, turkeys = 18, donkeys = 13). The respondents (41% veterinarians) came from 32 different countries. To describe welfare requirements, the words "feeding" and "water" were the most frequently used in all the species, meaning that respondents considered the welfare principle "good feeding" as the most relevant. The word "environment" was considered particularly important for turkeys, as well as the word "dry", never mentioned for other species. Horses stakeholders also considered "exercise" and "proper training" important. Goat stakeholders' concerns are often expressed by the word "space", probably because goats are often intensively managed in industrialized countries. Although the sample was too small to be representative, text mining analysis seems to be a promising method to investigate stakeholders' perception of animal welfare, as it emphasizes their real perception, without the constraints deriving by close-ended questions.

Indexed as

animal welfaredonkeygoathorsesheepstakeholder perceptiontext miningturkey

Identifiers

PMID31071978
PMCPMC6562437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.