ArticleHuman pathology2019
Diagnosis of urothelial carcinoma in situ using blue light cystoscopy and the utility of immunohistochemistry in blue light-positive lesions diagnosed as atypical.
Article in Human pathology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gold nanorod-assisted theranostic solution for nonvisible residual disease in bladder cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Article
- Application of nanotechnology in the diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Carcinoma in situ (CIS) is difficult to visualize with white light cystoscopy (WLC), whereas blue light cystoscopy (BLC) using photosensitizing agents improves detection rates. We retrospectively reviewed transurethral biopsies of bladder tumors in which both WLC and BLC evaluations were performed (n = 135 samples from 79 patients). Biopsies were classified based on the presence/absence of fluorescence under BLC and the final pathological report (CIS/benign/atypical). Forty-one (30%) cases were diagnosed as CIS; of those, 38 (93%) were BLC(+), including 23 that were WLC(-). Conversely, 51 (38%) lesions were BLC(+) but classified as non-CIS. Eleven BLC(+) cases were diagnosed as "atypical." These cases were anonymized and reviewed by 7 pathologists for concordance and then immunostained for CK20, p53, and Ki-67. Immunohistochemistry results were interpreted as consistent with CIS if there was full-thickness staining of CK20, more than 50% p53-positive cells, and more than 50% Ki-67-positive cells. Review of BLC(+)/atypical cases showed a mean agreement of 79%, and none of the cases showed staining pattern consistent with CIS. Therefore, all 11 cases of BLC(+)/atypical were considered non-CIS for the final analysis. All patients with BLC(+)/atypical lesions had a history of intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin and/or mitomycin. Using final pathology as the reference, sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value of BLC were 93% (confidence interval [CI], 80.1%-98.5%), 46% (CI, 35.4%-56.3%), and 94% (CI, 82.5%-97.8%), respectively. The low specificity of BLC leads to BLC(+) lesions with atypical diagnosis. Morphological classification of these lesions is fairly consistent among different pathologists. Immunohistochemistry for p53/CK20/Ki-67 in this setting is only helpful to potentially avoid overcalling CIS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.