Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31071161›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2019

Diagnostic accuracy and prognostic applications of CYFRA 21-1 in head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lihui Liu, Wenji Xie, Pei Xue, Zixuan Wei, Xiao Liang, Nianyong Chen

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Clinical relevance of CYFRA 21-1 as a tumour marker in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lihui LiuDepartment of Head & Neck Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Wenji XieDepartment of Head & Neck Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Pei XueSleep Medicine Center, Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Translational Neuroscience Center, State Key Laboratory, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Zixuan WeiDepartment of Neurosurgery of Huashan Hospital, Fundan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiao LiangDepartment of Head & Neck Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Nianyong ChenDepartment of Head & Neck Oncology, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7861-6812

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cytokeratin fraction 21-1 (CYFRA 21-1) has been widely studied as an important biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer for both diagnosis and prognosis. Many studies have also assessed the clinical applications of CYFRA 21-1 in head and neck cancer, but the diagnostic and prognostic values of CYFRA 21-1 are not yet fully established. This pooled analysis aims at evaluating the diagnostic accuracy and prognostic applications of CYFRA 21-1 in patients with head and neck cancer. A systematic retrieval of literatures was conducted without time or language restrictions by searching PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure. Twenty studies were eligible for systematic review, of which 14 conformed for diagnostic analysis and 7 for prognostic analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CYFRA 21-1 analysis were 0.53 (95% CI: 0.39-0.67) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.93-0.99), respectively. A high level of CYFRA 21-1 was significantly correlated with shorter overall survival (HR 1.33, 95% CI: 1.13-1.56) and disease-free survival (HR 1.48; 95%CI: 1.10-1.97). Current evidence indicates that the level of CYFRA 21-1 in the serum could be used as an indicator for monitoring tumor status and evaluating its curative effects.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansKeratin-19Prognosisantigen CYFRA21.1Antigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorKeratin-19

Identifiers

PMID31071161
PMCPMC6508679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.