Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31071159›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Complete chloroplast genome of Camellia japonica genome structures, comparative and phylogenetic analysis.

Wei Li, Cuiping Zhang, Xiao Guo, Qinghua Liu, Kuiling Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The complete chloroplast genome sequence ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025
    Article
  10. Comprehensive Analysis of the Fourteen Complete Genome Sequences ofJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024
    Article
  15. The complete chloroplast genome ofFrontiers in genetics · 2024
    Article
  16. Chloroplast genome structure analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The complete chloroplast genome ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wei LiCollege of Landscape Architecture and Forestry, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, China.
Cuiping ZhangCollege of Landscape Architecture and Forestry, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, China.
Xiao GuoCollege of Landscape Architecture and Forestry, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, China.
Qinghua LiuCollege of Landscape Architecture and Forestry, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, China.
Kuiling WangCollege of Landscape Architecture and Forestry, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3886-933X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Camellia is an economically, ecologically and phylogenetically valuable genus in the family Theaceae. The frequent interspecific hybridization and polyploidization makes this genus phylogenetically and taxonomically under controversial and require detailed investigation. Chloroplast (cp) genome sequences have been used for cpDNA marker development and genetic diversity evaluation. Our research newly sequenced the chloroplast genome of Camellia japonica using Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform, and retrieved five other chloroplast genomes of Camellia previously published for comparative analyses, thereby shedding lights on a deeper understanding of the applicability of chloroplast information. The chloroplast genome sizes ranged in length from 156,607 to 157,166 bp, and their gene structure resembled those of other higher plants. There were four categories of SSRs detected in six Camellia cpDNA sequences, with the lengths ranging from 10 to 17bp. The Camellia species exhibited different evolutionary routes that lhbA and orf188, followed by orf42 and psbZ, were readily lost during evolution. Obvious codon preferences were also shown in almost all protein-coding cpDNA and amino acid sequences. Selection pressure analysis revealed the influence of different environmental pressures on different Camellia chloroplast genomes during long-term evolution. All Camellia species, except C. crapnelliana, presented the identical rate of amplification in the IR region. The datasets obtained from the chloroplast genomes are highly supportive in inferring the phylogenetic relationships of the Camellia taxa, indicating that chloroplast genome can be used for classifying interspecific relationships in this genus.

Indexed as

Genome, ChloroplastCamelliaChromosome MappingCodonDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA, ChloroplastEvolution, MolecularGenetic MarkersGenome, PlantMicrosatellite RepeatsPhylogenySelection, GeneticCodonDNA, ChloroplastGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID31071159
PMCPMC6508735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.