Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31071138›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Comparison of conventional, amplification and bio-assay detection methods for a chronic wasting disease inoculum pool.

Erin McNulty, Amy V Nalls, Samuel Mellentine, Erin Hughes, Laura Pulscher, Edward A Hoover, Candace K Mathiason

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Tracking Prions by RT-QuIC: An Update.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Chronic Wasting Disease: State of the Science.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erin McNultyDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1918-6207
Amy V NallsDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4710-112X
Samuel MellentineDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Erin HughesDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Laura PulscherDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3996-5585
Edward A HooverDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Candace K MathiasonDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, United States of America.
Colorado State University · US

Funding

Transmission and Pathogenesis of Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD)R01NS061902 · NINDS · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MATHIASON, CANDACE K. · 2009 to 2022
$5.3M
Detection and Characterization of Blood-borne PrionsR01AI112956 · NIAID · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MATHIASON, CANDACE K. · 2014 to 2024
$4.6M
Chronic Wasting Disease VaccinesR01AI156037 · NIAID · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MATHIASON, CANDACE K. · 2021 to 2025
$3.5M
Mother to Offspring Transmission of Chronic Wasting DiseaseR01AI093634 · NIAID · COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MATHIASON, CANDACE K. · 2011 to 2015
$2.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI093634NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI112956NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI156037NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS061902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Longitudinal studies of chronic wasting disease (CWD) in the native host have provided considerable understanding of how this prion disease continues to efficiently spread among cervid species. These studies entail great cost in animal, time and financial support. A variety of methods have emerged including transgenic mouse bioassay, western blot, enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA), immunohistochemistry (IHC), serial protein misfolding cyclic amplification (sPMCA) and real time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC), that deepen our understanding of this and other protein misfolding disorders. To further characterize an inoculum source used for ongoing CWD studies and to determine how the readouts from each of these assays compare, we assayed a CWD-positive brain pool homogenate (CBP6) and a mouse dilutional bioassay of this homogenate using the above detection methods. We demonstrate that: (i) amplification assays enhanced detection of amyloid seeding activity in the CWD+ cervid brain pool to levels beyond mouse LD50, (ii) conventional detection methods (IHC and western blot) performed well in identifying the presence of PrPSc in terminal brain tissue yet lack sufficient detection sensitivity to identify all CWD-infected mice, and (iii) the incorporation of amplification assays enhanced detection of CWD-infected mice near the LD50. This cross-platform analysis provides a basis to calibrate the relative sensitivities of CWD detection assays.

Indexed as

AmyloidAnimalsBiological AssayBrainDeerMiceMice, TransgenicNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPrion ProteinsPrionsWasting Disease, ChronicAmyloidPrion ProteinsPrions

Identifiers

PMID31071138
PMCPMC6508678
OpenAlexW2944239241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.