Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31071108›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer patients. A population pharmacodynamic modeling.

Patricia Martin-Romano, Belén P Solans, David Cano, Jose Carlos Subtil, Ana Chopitea, Leire Arbea, Maria Dolores Lozano, Eduardo Castanon, Iosune Baraibar, Diego Salas and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia Martin-RomanoDepartment of Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6444-348X
Belén P SolansDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, School of Pharmacy, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
David CanoDepartment of Radiology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Jose Carlos SubtilDepartment of Gastroenterology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Ana ChopiteaDepartment of Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Leire ArbeaDepartment of Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Maria Dolores LozanoDepartment of Pathology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Eduardo CastanonDepartment of Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Iosune BaraibarDepartment of Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Diego SalasDepartment of Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Jose Luis Hernandez-LizoainDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Iñaki F TrocónizDepartment of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, School of Pharmacy, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Javier RodriguezDepartment of Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Clinica Universidad de Navarra · ESUniversidad de Navarra · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerioperative chemotherapy (CT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with locally advanced gastric (GC) or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC) has been shown to improve survival compared to an exclusive surgical approach. However, most patients retain a poor prognosis due to important relapse rates. Population pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling may allow identifying at risk-patients. We aimed to develop a mechanistic PK/PD model to characterize the relationship between the type of neoadjuvant therapy, histopathologic response and survival times in locally advanced GC and GEJC patients.

methodsPatients with locally advanced GC and GEJC treated with neoadjuvant CT with or without preoperative CRT were analyzed. Clinical response was assessed by CT-scan and EUS. Pathologic response was defined as a reduction on pTNM stage compared to baseline cTNM. Metastasis development risk and overall survival (OS) were described using the population approach with NONMEM 7.3. Model evaluation was performed through predictive checks.

resultsA low correlation was observed between clinical and pathologic TNM stage for both T (R = 0.32) and N (R = 0.19) categories. A low correlation between clinical and pathologic response was noticed (R = -0.29). The OS model adequately described the observed survival rates. Disease recurrence, cTNM stage ≥3 and linitis plastica absence, were correlated to a higher risk of death.

conclusionOur model adequately described clinical response profiles, though pathologic response could not be predicted. Although the risk of disease recurrence and survival were linked, the identification of alternative approaches aimed to tailor therapeutic strategies to the individual patient risk warrants further research.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsChemoradiotherapyChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalStomach NeoplasmsSurvival RateAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID31071108
PMCPMC6508715
OpenAlexW2944167716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.