ArticlePloS one2019
Multi-scale detection of hierarchical community architecture in structural and functional brain networks.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Relating Cognition to both Brain Structure and Function: A Systematic Review of Methods.Brain connectivity · 2023Pooled it
- Geometric constraints on the architecture of mammalian cortical connectomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Spiking dynamics of individual neurons reflect changes in the structure and function of neuronal networks.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Open datasets and code for multi-scale relations on structure, function and neuro-genetics in the human brain.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Cortical timescales and the modular organization of structural and functional brain networks.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Impact of brain parcellation on prediction performance in models of cognition and demographics.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- Age-associated alterations in thalamocortical structural connectivity in youths with a psychosis-spectrum disorder.Schizophrenia (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Using graph theory as a common language to combine neural structure and function in models of healthy cognitive performance.Human brain mapping · 2023Article
- Internal control of brain networks via sparse feedback.AIChE journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers · 2023Article
- Modularity maximization to design contiguous policy zones for pandemic response.European journal of operational research · 2023Article
- Abnormal structural and functional network topological properties associated with left prefrontal, parietal, and occipital cortices significantly predict childhood TBI-related attention deficits: A semi-supervised deep learning study.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Hierarchical organization of spontaneous co-fluctuations in densely sampled individuals using fMRI.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023Article
- Detecting hierarchical organization of pervasive communities by modular decomposition of Markov chain.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Brain Mapping of Behavioral Domains Using Multi-Scale Networks and Canonical Correlation Analysis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Measurement reliability for individual differences in multilayer network dynamics: Cautions and considerations.NeuroImage · 2021Article
- Default-mode network streams for coupling to language and control systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Low-Dimensional Spatiotemporal Dynamics Underlie Cortex-wide Neural Activity.Current biology : CB · 2020Article
- Article
- Estimation of global and local complexities of brain networks: A random walks approach.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Community detection algorithms have been widely used to study the organization of complex networks like the brain. These techniques provide a partition of brain regions (or nodes) into clusters (or communities), where nodes within a community are densely interconnected with one another. In their simplest application, community detection algorithms are agnostic to the presence of community hierarchies: clusters embedded within clusters of other clusters. To address this limitation, we exercise a multi-scale extension of a common community detection technique, and we apply the tool to synthetic graphs and to graphs derived from human neuroimaging data, including structural and functional imaging data. Our multi-scale community detection algorithm links a graph to copies of itself across neighboring topological scales, thereby becoming sensitive to conserved community organization across levels of the hierarchy. We demonstrate that this method is sensitive to topological inhomogeneities of the graph's hierarchy by providing a local measure of community stability and inter-scale reliability across topological scales. We compare the brain's structural and functional network architectures, and we demonstrate that structural graphs display a more prominent hierarchical community organization than functional graphs. Finally, we build an explicitly multimodal multiplex graph that combines both structural and functional connectivity in a single model, and we identify the topological scales where resting state functional connectivity and underlying structural connectivity show similar versus unique hierarchical community architecture. Together, our results demonstrate the advantages of the multi-scale community detection algorithm in studying hierarchical community structure in brain graphs, and they illustrate its utility in modeling multimodal neuroimaging data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.