ArticlePLoS computational biology2019
Macroscopic phase resetting-curves determine oscillatory coherence and signal transfer in inter-coupled neural circuits.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phase-dependent stimulation response is shaped by the brain's dynamic functional connectivity.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- TVB C++: A Fast and Flexible Back-End for The Virtual Brain.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Synaptic effects on the intermittent synchronization of gamma rhythms.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2024Article
- Firing rate models for gamma oscillations in I-I and E-I networks.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2024Article
- Complex spatiotemporal oscillations emerge from transverse instabilities in large-scale brain networks.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Interneuronal network model of theta-nested fast oscillations predicts differential effects of heterogeneity, gap junctions and short term depression for hyperpolarizing versus shunting inhibition.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- A framework for macroscopic phase-resetting curves for generalised spiking neural networks.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Phase-locking patterns underlying effective communication in exact firing rate models of neural networks.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Long-Range Amplitude Coupling Is Optimized for Brain Networks That Function at Criticality.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022Article
- Article
- On the Role of Arkypallidal and Prototypical Neurons for Phase Transitions in the External Pallidum.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021Article
- Paradoxical phase response of gamma rhythms facilitates their entrainment in heterogeneous networks.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Transmission delays and frequency detuning can regulate information flow between brain regions.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Frequency-Resolved Functional Connectivity: Role of Delay and the Strength of Connections.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021Article
- Information Transmission in Delay-Coupled Neuronal Circuits in the Presence of a Relay Population.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021Article
- Patient-Specific Network Connectivity Combined With a Next Generation Neural Mass Model to Test Clinical Hypothesis of Seizure Propagation.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2021Article
- Exact neural mass model for synaptic-based working memory.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Understanding the dynamics of biological and neural oscillator networks through exact mean-field reductions: a review.Journal of mathematical neuroscience · 2020Review
- Theta-Nested Gamma Oscillations in Next Generation Neural Mass Models.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2020Article
- Synchronization, Stochasticity, and Phase Waves in Neuronal Networks With Spatially-Structured Connectivity.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Macroscopic oscillations of different brain regions show multiple phase relationships that are persistent across time and have been implicated in routing information. While multiple cellular mechanisms influence the network oscillatory dynamics and structure the macroscopic firing motifs, one of the key questions is to identify the biophysical neuronal and synaptic properties that permit such motifs to arise. A second important issue is how the different neural activity coherence states determine the communication between the neural circuits. Here we analyse the emergence of phase-locking within bidirectionally delayed-coupled spiking circuits in which global gamma band oscillations arise from synaptic coupling among largely excitable neurons. We consider both the interneuronal (ING) and the pyramidal-interneuronal (PING) population gamma rhythms and the inter coupling targeting the pyramidal or the inhibitory neurons. Using a mean-field approach together with an exact reduction method, we reduce each spiking network to a low dimensional nonlinear system and derive the macroscopic phase resetting-curves (mPRCs) that determine how the phase of the global oscillation responds to incoming perturbations. This is made possible by the use of the quadratic integrate-and-fire model together with a Lorentzian distribution of the bias current. Depending on the type of gamma (PING vs. ING), we show that incoming excitatory inputs can either speed up the macroscopic oscillation (phase advance; type I PRC) or induce both a phase advance and a delay (type II PRC). From there we determine the structure of macroscopic coherence states (phase-locking) of two weakly synaptically-coupled networks. To do so we derive a phase equation for the coupled system which links the synaptic mechanisms to the coherence states of the system. We show that a synaptic transmission delay is a necessary condition for symmetry breaking, i.e. a non-symmetric phase lag between the macroscopic oscillations. This potentially provides an explanation to the experimentally observed variety of gamma phase-locking modes. Our analysis further shows that symmetry-broken coherence states can lead to a preferred direction of signal transfer between the oscillatory networks where this directionality also depends on the timing of the signal. Hence we suggest a causal theory for oscillatory modulation of functional connectivity between cortical circuits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.