Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31070992›Full record

SynthesisHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2019

Vaccination timeliness and delay in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of the literature, 2007-2017.

Nina B Masters, Abram L Wagner, Matthew L Boulton

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Mpox awareness and vaccination willingness among a household cohort in Matlab, Bangladesh.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nina B MastersDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3155-6058
Abram L WagnerDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4691-7802
Matthew L BoultonDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

Characterizing parental beliefs to support optimization of vaccine introductionK01AI137123 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WAGNER, ABRAM LUTHER · 2019 to 2023
$475k
NIAID NIH HHS K01 AI137123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Immunization ProgramsDeveloping CountriesHumansImmunization ScheduleIncomeTime FactorsVaccination CoverageVaccinesVaccinesexpanded program on immunizationvaccine coverageVaccine timeliness

Identifiers

PMID31070992
PMCPMC6930087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.