Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31070981›Full record

ArticleJournal of global oncology2019

Prospective Survey of Financial Toxicity Measured by the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity in Japanese Patients With Cancer.

Kazunori Honda, Bishal Gyawali, Masashi Ando, Ryosuke Kumanishi, Kyoko Kato, Keiji Sugiyama, Seiichiro Mitani, Toshiki Masuishi, Yukiya Narita, Hideaki Bando and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Measures of financial toxicity in cancer survivors: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Financial toxicity and employment status in cancer survivors. A systematic literature review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Association between financial toxicity and frailty among older patients with cancer: a cross-sectional study using COST and G8.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Sociodemographic Factors related to Financial Toxicity among Cancer Patients and Survivors:"The Second Cancer Patient Experience Survey" - A Nationwide Study in Japan.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  13. Association between time to treatment and financial toxicity among women with breast cancer in Ethiopia: a multicentre study in a low-resource setting.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kazunori HondaAichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Bishal GyawaliQueen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Masashi AndoAichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Ryosuke KumanishiAichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Kyoko KatoAichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Keiji SugiyamaAichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Seiichiro MitaniAichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Toshiki MasuishiAichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Yukiya NaritaAichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Hideaki BandoAichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Hiroya TaniguchiAichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Shigenori KadowakiAichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Takashi UraAichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Kei MuroAichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe previously reported on the pilot study assessing the feasibility of using the Japanese translation of the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) tool to measure financial toxicity (FT) among Japanese patients with cancer. In this study, we report the results of the prospective survey assessing FT in Japanese patients with cancer using the same tool. PATIENTS AND

methodsEligible patients were receiving chemotherapy for a solid tumor for at least 2 months. In addition to the COST survey, socioeconomic characteristics were collected by using a questionnaire and medical records.

resultsOf the 191 patients approached, 156 (82%) responded to the questionnaire. Primary tumor sites were colorectal (n = 77; 49%), gastric (n = 39; 25%), esophageal (n = 16; 10%), thyroid (n = 9; 6%), head and neck (n = 4; 3%), and other (n = 11; 7%). Median COST score was 21 (range, 0 to 41; mean ± standard deviation, 12.1 ± 8.45), with lower COST scores indicating more severe FT. On multivariable analyses using linear regression, older age (β, 0.15 per year; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.28;

conclusionUsing the Japanese version of the COST tool, we identified various factors associated with FT in Japanese patients with cancer. These findings will have important implications for cancer policy planning in Japan.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessHealth ExpendituresAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPilot ProjectsPublic Health Surveillance

Identifiers

PMID31070981
PMCPMC6550026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.