ArticleThe American journal of orthopsychiatry2019
Mentoring future researchers: Advice and considerations.
Article in The American journal of orthopsychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Defining and Addressing Gaps in Mentorship for Underrepresented Faculty.Family medicine · 2025Article
- Evaluating and supporting leadership, management, and mentoring: a framework for catalyzing responsible research and healthy research environments.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2025Review
- Speaking our Culture into Existence: A Successful Application of the Stewardship Model.Mentoring & tutoring · 2025Article
- Structural Racism in Psychiatric Research Careers: Eradicating Barriers to a More Diverse Workforce.The American journal of psychiatry · 2023Review
- Addressing challenges faced by underrepresented biomedical investigators and efforts to address them: An NHLBI-PRIDE perspective.Journal of the National Medical Association · 2022Review
- Reflections on Mentorship From Scientists and Mentors in an Alzheimer's Disease Focused Research Training Program.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2022Article
- Maternal and Child Health Pipeline Training Programs: A Description of Training Across 6 Funded Programs.Maternal and child health journal · 2022Article
- Building Diverse Mentoring Networks that Transcend Boundaries in Cancer Research.Trends in cancer · 2021Article
- Increasing Access and Quality of Behavior-Analytic Services for the Latinx Population.Behavior and social issues · 2021Article
- The Society for Prevention Research 20 Years Later: a Summary of Training Needs.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite efforts to increase the diversity of academia, minority scholars continue to face significant barriers (e.g., higher financial burden, lack of institutional support for research interests, social isolation) that undermine their representation in the field and overall professional success. Researchers have suggested increased mentorship as a means of mitigating these challenges. In 2015, with the support of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, a panel of senior investigators met via WebEx to discuss strategies to improve the mentorship of underrepresented scholars. The topics covered by this panel included factors that optimize or challenge mentorship based on personal experience, what is special about mentorship in the context of race/ethnicity, relational dynamics, work-life balance, discrimination, and how to address challenges to the mentoring relationship. The current article provides an overview of the convening and synthesizes the lessons learned by panelists' first-hand experiences of mentoring trainees and junior faculty of color. Authors conclude with recommendations and a description of the social and institutional implications of bolstering the professional support of minority scholars. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.