Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31070373›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2019

Molecular Interactions of Cephalosporins with the Deep Binding Pocket of the RND Transporter AcrB.

Alessio Atzori, Giuliano Malloci, Jigneshkumar Dahyabhai Prajapati, Andrea Basciu, Andrea Bosin, Ulrich Kleinekathöfer, Jürg Dreier, Attilio V Vargiu, Paolo Ruggerone

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Alessio AtzoriDepartment of Physics , University of Cagliari , 09042 Monserrato (CA), Italy.
Giuliano MallociDepartment of Physics , University of Cagliari , 09042 Monserrato (CA), Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5985-257X
Jigneshkumar Dahyabhai PrajapatiDepartment of Physics and Earth Sciences , Jacobs University Bremen , Campus Ring 1 , 28759 Bremen , Germany.
Andrea BasciuDepartment of Physics , University of Cagliari , 09042 Monserrato (CA), Italy.
Andrea BosinDepartment of Physics , University of Cagliari , 09042 Monserrato (CA), Italy.
Ulrich KleinekathöferDepartment of Physics and Earth Sciences , Jacobs University Bremen , Campus Ring 1 , 28759 Bremen , Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6114-7431
Jürg DreierBasilea Pharmaceutica International Ltd. , Grenzacherstrasse 487 , 4058 Basel , Switzerland.
Attilio V VargiuDepartment of Physics , University of Cagliari , 09042 Monserrato (CA), Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4013-8867
Paolo RuggeroneDepartment of Physics , University of Cagliari , 09042 Monserrato (CA), Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0825-0824
University of Cagliari · ITConstructor University · DEBasilea Pharmaceutica (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

Optimization of efflux avoidance and inhibition for antibiotic developmentR01AI136799 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI GNANAKARAN, SANDRASEGARAM, RUGGERONE, PAOLO · 2018 to 2022
$5.7M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI136799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The drug/proton antiporter AcrB, part of the major efflux pump AcrABZ-TolC in Escherichia coli, is characterized by its impressive ability to transport chemically diverse compounds, conferring a multidrug resistance phenotype. However, the molecular features differentiating between good and poor substrates of the pump have yet to be identified. In this work, we combined molecular docking with molecular dynamics simulations to study the interactions between AcrB and two representative cephalosporins, cefepime and ceftazidime (a good and poor substrate of AcrB, respectively). Our analysis revealed different binding preferences of the two compounds toward the subsites of the large deep binding pocket of AcrB. Cefepime, although less hydrophobic than ceftazidime, showed a higher affinity than ceftazidime for the so-called hydrophobic trap, a region known for binding inhibitors and substrates. This supports the hypothesis that surface complementarity between the molecule and AcrB, more than the intrinsic hydrophobicity of the antibiotic, is a feature required for the interaction within this region. Oppositely, the preference of ceftazidime for binding outside the hydrophobic trap might not be optimal for triggering allosteric conformational changes needed to the transporter to accomplish its function. Altogether, our findings could provide valuable information for the design of new antibiotics less susceptible to the efflux mechanism.

Indexed as

Molecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationATP-Binding Cassette, Sub-Family C ProteinsBinding SitesCephalosporinsEscherichia coli ProteinsHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsProtein ConformationAcrB protein, E coliATP-Binding Cassette, Sub-Family C ProteinsCephalosporinsEscherichia coli Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31070373
PMCPMC6939625
OpenAlexW2944586526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.