Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31070075›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2019

Rapid Successful Reperfusion of Basilar Artery Occlusion Strokes With Pretreatment Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Posterior-Circulation ASPECTS <8 Is Associated With Good Outcome.

Morgan Guillaume, Bertrand Lapergue, Benjamin Gory, Julien Labreuche, Arturo Consoli, Gioia Mione, Lisa Humbertjean, Jean-Christophe Lacour, Mikael Mazighi, Michel Piotin and 3 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Morgan Guillaume1 Stroke Unit Department of Neurology University Hospital of Nancy France.
Bertrand Lapergue3 Department of Neurology Stroke Center Hôpital Foch Suresnes France.
Benjamin Gory4 Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology University Hospital of Nancy France.
Julien Labreuche6 CHU Lille, EA 2694-Santé publique: épidémiologie et qualité des soins University of Lille Lille France.
Arturo Consoli7 Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Neuroradiology Hôpital Foch Suresnes France.
Gioia Mione1 Stroke Unit Department of Neurology University Hospital of Nancy France.
Lisa Humbertjean1 Stroke Unit Department of Neurology University Hospital of Nancy France.
Jean-Christophe Lacour1 Stroke Unit Department of Neurology University Hospital of Nancy France.
Mikael Mazighi8 Department of Interventional Neuroradiology Rothschild Foundation Paris France.
Michel Piotin8 Department of Interventional Neuroradiology Rothschild Foundation Paris France.
Raphaël Blanc8 Department of Interventional Neuroradiology Rothschild Foundation Paris France.
Sébastien Richard1 Stroke Unit Department of Neurology University Hospital of Nancy France.
Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The association between time to reperfusion and clinical outcome is well known in anterior circulation strokes, whereas the impact of main time metrics remains unknown in posterior circulation strokes. We investigated the clinical effect of different time intervals from symptom onset to reperfusion on the 90-day clinical outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients with basilar artery occlusion, and especially in the subset population presenting a low stroke volume on baseline diffusion-weighted imaging. Methods and Results We studied patients included in the prospective, multicenter, observational ETIS (Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke) registry who had had basal artery occlusion and had achieved successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction 2b-3). Three time intervals (onset to reperfusion, onset to imaging, and imaging to reperfusion) were considered in all patients and separately in patients with pc- ASPECTS (posterior-circulation Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score) <8 and ≥8 on baseline diffusion-weighted imaging. The primary end point was good outcome defined as 90-day modified Rankin Scale scores of 0 to 2. Among the 95 included patients, 38 (40%) achieved a good outcome. In all patients, no significant association was found between the different time intervals and outcome. In patients evaluated with diffusion-weighted imaging (n=61) at baseline, a significant negative association was found between imaging-to-reperfusion time for patients with pc- ASPECTS <8 (adjusted odds ratio=0.4 per 30-minute increase; 95% CI 0.18-0.85; P=0.02) compared with those with pc- ASPECTS ≥8. Conclusions In patients with basilar artery occlusion and pc- ASPECTS <8 at baseline diffusion-weighted imaging, clinical outcome is highly dependent on the time from imaging to reperfusion, which suggests that rapid endovascular reperfusion should be performed after imaging in these patients.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular CirculationDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingEndovascular ProceduresThrombectomyTime-to-TreatmentAgedAged, 80 and overDisability EvaluationFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProspective StudiesRecovery of Functionoutcomeposterior circulationreperfusionthrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID31070075
PMCPMC6585336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.