Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31069966›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2019

Association of the prognostic nutritional index and overall survival in patients with colorectal cancer: A STROBE compliant retrospective cohort study.

Julissa Luvián-Morales, Sagrario González-Trejo, José F Carrillo, Roberto Herrera-Goepfert, Vincenzo Aiello-Crocifoglio, Dolores Gallardo-Rincón, Francisco J Ochoa-Carrillo, Luis F Oñate-Ocaña

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Julissa Luvián-MoralesSubdirección de Investigación Clínica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Mexico City, Mexico.
Sagrario González-TrejoSubdirección de Investigación Clínica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Mexico City, Mexico.
José F CarrilloSubdirección de Cirugía, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Mexico City, Mexico.
Roberto Herrera-GoepfertDepartamento de Patología, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Mexico City, Mexico.
Vincenzo Aiello-CrocifoglioDepartamento de Gastroenterología, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Mexico City, Mexico.
Dolores Gallardo-RincónDepartamento de Oncología Médica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Mexico City, Mexico.
Francisco J Ochoa-CarrilloSubdirección de Cirugía, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Mexico City, Mexico.
Luis F Oñate-OcañaSubdirección de Investigación Clínica, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología (INCan), Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-2020-0283

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe TNM classification does not completely reflect the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Several clinical factors have been used to increase its prognostic value, but factors pertaining to the patient's immunonutritional status have not usually been addressed. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of Prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and other well-known prognostic factors by multivariate analysis in a cohort of patients with CRC.

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with CRC managed in a cancer center between January 1992 and December 2016. Cox's model was used to define the association of the PNI and other factors with Overall survival (OS).

resultsA total of 3301 patients were included: 47.7% were female and 52.3% were male, with a mean age of 58.7 years. By bivariate analysis, PNI was strongly associated with OS (Risk ratio [RR] 0.968, 95% Confidence interval [CI] 0.962-0.974; P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, PNI was an independent explanatory variable (as continuous variable and as categorized variable; RR 0.732, 95% CI 0.611-0.878; RR 0.656, 95% CI 0.529-0.813 and RR 0.646, 95% CI 0.521-0.802, for quintiles 2, 3, and 4-5, respectively); a biological gradient effect was demonstrated. The final prognostic model included PNI, location of the neoplasia in the colorectum, basal hemoglobin, lymphocyte count, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, platelet/lymphocyte ratio, TNM stage, differentiation degree, R classification, and postoperative complications.

conclusionsPNI is a significant and independent prognostic factor in patients with CRC. Its prognostic value adds precision to the TNM staging system including specific subgroups of patients with CRC; it should be evaluated in prospective clinical studies.

Indexed as

Nutritional StatusAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersColorectal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNutrition AssessmentPrognosisPublic Health SurveillanceBiomarkerscolorectal cancernutrition assessmentprognosisprognostic nutritional indexsurvival

Identifiers

PMID31069966
PMCPMC6601598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.