Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31069938›Full record

ReviewThe international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS2019

A review on recent advances in soft surgical robots for endoscopic applications.

M Wildan Gifari, Hamid Naghibi, Stefano Stramigioli, Momen Abayazid

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Shape-Programming in Hyperelasticity Through Differential Growth.Applied mathematics and optimization · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Research Progress of Robot Technology inInternational journal of bioprinting · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Impact of industry 4.0 to create advancements in orthopaedics.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. A review on recent advances in soft surgical robots for endoscopic applications.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2019
    Review
  18. The evolution of lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: where are we now?Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopy
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

M Wildan GifariRobotics and Mechatronics, Universiteit Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
Hamid NaghibiRobotics and Mechatronics, Universiteit Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7109-9808
Stefano StramigioliRobotics and Mechatronics, Universiteit Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
Momen AbayazidRobotics and Mechatronics, Universiteit Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.

Funding

Indonesian Endowment Fund for Education (LPDP)Technical Medical (TechMed) Centre, University of Twente
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSoft materials, with their compliant properties, enable conformity and safe interaction with human body. With the advance in actuation and sensing of soft materials, new paradigm in robotics called "soft robotics" emerges. Soft robotics has become a new approach in designing medical devices such as wearable robotic gloves and exoskeleton. However, application of soft robotics in surgical instrument inside human body is still in its infancy.

aimsIn this paper, current application and design of soft robots specifically applied for endoscopy are reviewed. MATERIALS &

methodsDifferent aspects in the implementation of soft robotics in endoscope design were reviewed. The key studies about MIS and NOTES were reviewed to establish the clinical background and extract the limitations of current endoscopic device in the last decade. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: In this review study, the implementation of soft robotics concepts in endoscopic application, with highlights on different features of several soft endoscopes, were evaluated. The progress in different aspects of soft robotics endoscope, current state, and future perspectives were also discussed.

conclusionBased on the survey on the structural specification, actuation, sensing, and stiffening the future soft surgical endoscopes are recommended to fulfil the following specifications: safe especially from pressure leakage, fully biocompatible materials, MR-compatible, capable for large bending in at least two antagonistic directions, modularity, adjustable stiffness.

Indexed as

EndoscopyEquipment DesignHumansMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresRoboticsRobotic Surgical Proceduresabdominalactuatorsdigestive systemendoscopyminimal invasive surgerynatural orifice surgerysafetysensorssoft robotics

Identifiers

PMID31069938
PMCPMC6771908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.