ArticleMedical physics2019
Performance evaluation of the 5-Ring GE Discovery MI PET/CT system using the national electrical manufacturers association NU 2-2012 Standard.
Article in Medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
65 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reconstruction-dependent differences in brain [18F]FDG PET: a large-scale same-acquisition comparison of Q.Clear and VUE Point FX.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Performance Evaluation of SmartBrain: A Wearable PET System for Human Brain Imaging.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026Article
- An integrated PET/CT simulation framework for virtual imaging trials and quantitative performance evaluation.Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB) · 2026Article
- Impact of DOI Capability on Detector Performance: A Comparative Study of DOI and Non-DOI Detectors for High-Resolution and Sensitivity Organ-Specific PET Inserts.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2026Article
- FAPi-PET/CT as surrogate marker for subclinical myocardial fibrosis is a prognostic tool for patients undergoing left-sided heart valve surgery.EJNMMI research · 2026Article
- Clinical evaluation of tissue-dependent and spatially-variant positron range correction for Gallium-68 PET imaging.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026Article
- Effects of Extended-Release Methylphenidate on Dopamine and Norepinephrine Transporters in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Longitudinal Dual-Tracer PET Study.Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2026Article
- Deep learning-enhanced digital-BGO versus TOF PET/CT: comparative assessment of detection, quantitation, and overall image quality.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Improving data-driven gated (DDG) PET and CT registration in thoracic lesions: a comparison of AI registration and DDG CT.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Midlife Steroid-Binding Globulin Levels and In Vivo Neuroimaging Measures of Tau in Older Men and Women.Annals of neurology · 2025Article
- Quantitative Measurement of Tau Burden in a Dual-Time-Window Dynamic PET Imaging Protocol with [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025Article
- PET/CT acquisition and processing protocols in the Netherlands.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Impact of tissue-independent positron range correction on [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Development of Whole-Body TOF-DOI PET Detector Using Dual-Ended Readout Method.IEEE transactions on instrumentation and measurement · 2025Article
- Monte Carlo methods for medical imaging research.Biomedical engineering letters · 2024Review
- PET detectors with depth-of-interaction and time-of-flight capabilities.Radiological physics and technology · 2024Review
- New full-counts phase-matched data-driven gated (DDG) PET/CT.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Data-driven gated positron emission tomography/computed tomography for radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Review
- Performance characteristics of the 5-ring GE Discovery MI PET/CT scanner using AAPM TG-126 report.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Reduction of [EJNMMI physics · 2024Article
5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The GE Discovery MI PET/CT system has a modular digital detector design allowing three, four, or five detector block rings that extend the axial field-of-view (FOV) from 15 to 25 cm in 5 cm increments. This study investigated the performance of the 5-ring system and compared it to 3- and 4-ring systems; the GE Discovery IQ system that uses conventional photomultiplier tubes; and the GE Signa PET/MR system that has a reduced transaxial FOV.
methodsPET performance was evaluated at three different institutions. Spatial resolution, sensitivity, counting rate performance, accuracy, and image quality were measured in accordance with National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2012 standards. The mean energy resolution, mean timing resolution, and PET/CT subsystem alignment were also measured. Phantoms were used to determine the effects of varying acquisition time and reconstruction parameters on image quality. Retrospective patient scans were reconstructed with various scan durations to evaluate the impact on image quality.
resultsResults from all three institutions were similar. Radial/tangential/axial full width at half maximum spatial resolution measurements using the filtered back projection algorithm were 4.3/4.3/5.0 mm, 5.5/4.6/6.5 mm, and 7.4/5.0/6.6 mm at 1, 10, and 20 cm from the center of the FOV, respectively. Measured sensitivity at the center of the FOV (20.84 cps/kBq) was significantly higher than systems with reduced axial FOV. The peak noise-equivalent counting rate was 266.3 kcps at 20.8 kBq/ml, with a corresponding scatter fraction of 40.2%. The correction accuracy for count losses up to the peak noise-equivalent counting rate was 3.6%. For the 10-, 13-, 17-, 22-, 28-, and 37-mm spheres, contrast recoveries in the image quality phantom were measured to be 46.2%, 54.3%, 66.1%, 71.1%, 85.3%, and 89.3%, respectively. The mean energy and timing resolution were 9.55% and 381.7 ps, respectively. Phantom and patient images demonstrated excellent image quality, even at short acquisition times or low injected activity.
conclusionCompared to other PET/CT models, the extended axial FOV improved the overall PET performance of the 5-ring GE Discovery MI scanner. This system offers the potential to reduce scan times or injected activities through increased sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.