Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31069788›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of dermatology2019

Sunscreen photoprotection and vitamin D status.

T Passeron, R Bouillon, V Callender, T Cestari, T L Diepgen, A C Green, J C van der Pols, B A Bernard, F Ly, F Bernerd and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of dermatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 193 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Shift Work and Serum Vitamin D Levels: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Innovative digital solution supporting sun protection and vitamin D synthesis by using satellite-based monitoring of solar radiation.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2022
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sunscreen, vitamin D and skin of colour.Australian prescriber · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. [Vitamin D deficiency: positioning of the Medical Nutrition Research Unit].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2025
    Review

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 9 countries.

T PasseronDepartment of Dermatology, CHU Nice, Université Côte d'Azur, CHU Nice, 151, route de Ginestière, 06200, Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0797-6570
R BouillonLaboratory of Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Gasthuisberg, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6446-3763
V CallenderCallender Dermatology & Cosmetic Center, 12200 Annapolis Road, Suite 315, Glenn Dale, MD, 20769, U.S.A.
T CestariFederal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Ramiro Barcellos 2350 zone 13, Porto Alegre, RS, 90035-903, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3001-0202
T L DiepgenDepartment of Clinical Social Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Voßstr. 2, 69115, Heidelberg, Germany.
A C GreenCancer and Population Studies Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2753-4841
J C van der PolsSchool of Exercise and Nutrition Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, 4059, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4169-1795
B A BernardL'Oréal R&I, Scientific Directorate, 9 rue Pierre Dreyfus, 92110, Clichy, France.
F LyFaculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Odontology, University Cheikh Anta Diop of Dakar, BP 5825, Dakar, Senegal.ORCID 0000-0003-4132-9315
F BernerdL'Oréal R&I, 1 Avenue Eugène Schueller, 93600, Aulnay-sous-bois, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5426-7948
L MarrotL'Oréal R&I, 1 Avenue Eugène Schueller, 93600, Aulnay-sous-bois, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5353-192X
M NielsenL'Oréal R&I, Scientific Directorate, 9 rue Pierre Dreyfus, 92110, Clichy, France.
M VerschooreL'Oréal R&I, Scientific Directorate, 9 rue Pierre Dreyfus, 92110, Clichy, France.
N G JablonskiDepartment of Anthropology, The Pennsylvania State University, 409 Carpenter Building, University Park, PA, 16802, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0001-7644-874X
A R YoungSt John's Institute of Dermatology, King's College London, London, SE1 9RT, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-4163-6772
L'Oréal (France) · FRCheikh Anta Diop University · SNHeidelberg University · DEInserm · FRKing's College London · GBKU Leuven · BEPennsylvania State University · USQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

L'Oréal
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobal concern about vitamin D deficiency has fuelled debates on photoprotection and the importance of solar exposure to meet vitamin D requirements.

objectivesTo review the published evidence to reach a consensus on the influence of photoprotection by sunscreens on vitamin D status, considering other relevant factors.

methodsAn international panel of 13 experts in endocrinology, dermatology, photobiology, epidemiology and biological anthropology reviewed the literature prior to a 1-day meeting in June 2017, during which the evidence was discussed. Methods of assessment and determining factors of vitamin D status, and public health perspectives were examined and consequences of sun exposure and the effects of photoprotection were assessed.

resultsA serum level of ≥ 50 nmol L

conclusionsSunscreen use for daily and recreational photoprotection does not compromise vitamin D synthesis, even when applied under optimal conditions. What's already known about this topic? Knowledge of the relationship between solar exposure behaviour, sunscreen use and vitamin D is important for public health but there is confusion about optimal vitamin D status and the safest way to achieve this. Practical recommendations on the potential impact of daily and/or recreational sunscreens on vitamin D status are lacking for healthy people. What does this study add? Judicious use of daily broad-spectrum sunscreens with high ultraviolet (UV) A protection will not compromise vitamin D status in healthy people. However, photoprotection strategies for patients with photosensitivity disorders that include high sun-protection factor sunscreens with high UVA protection, along with protective clothing and shade-seeking behaviour are likely to compromise vitamin D status. Screening for vitamin D status and supplementation are recommended in patients with photosensitivity disorders.

Indexed as

ConsensusEvidence-Based MedicineGlobal HealthHumansMass ScreeningRecreationReference ValuesSkinSkin NeoplasmsSunlightSun Protection FactorSunscreening AgentsUltraviolet RaysVitamin DVitamin D DeficiencySunscreening AgentsVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID31069788
PMCPMC6899926
OpenAlexW2944340031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.