ReviewTargeted oncology2019
Current Systemic Treatment Landscape of Advanced Gynecologic Malignancies.
Review in Targeted oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Creation and Validation of Patient-Derived Cancer Model Using Peritoneal and Pleural Effusion in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer: An Early Experience.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Controversy on Positive Peritoneal Cytology of Endometrial Carcinoma.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Review
- Pembrolizumab in endometrial cancer: Where we stand now.Oncology letters · 2021Review
- Development of a novel immune-related lncRNA signature as a prognostic classifier for endometrial carcinoma.International journal of biological sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developments in systemic therapies beyond traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy have resulted in an unparalleled number of US Food and Drug Administration approvals in the past 5 years for ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancer. In this review, we highlight registration trials leading to recent Food and Drug Administration approvals for targeted systemic therapies in advanced gynecologic malignancies, encompassing three classes of agents: the antiangiogenic anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody bevacizumab in ovarian and cervical cancer, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in ovarian cancer, and the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab in cervical and endometrial cancer. The addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy has been approved in frontline and relapsed advanced ovarian cancer, in both platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive settings. Three poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors are approved for women with ovarian cancer. Olaparib and rucaparib are utilized in recurrent germline or somatic BRCA mutated ovarian cancer. Along with a third poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, niraparib, they are also Food and Drug Administration approved as maintenance therapy regardless of BRCA mutation status for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer in complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy. More recently, olaparib was approved as maintenance therapy for BRCA mutated ovarian cancer following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Pembrolizumab has been approved for relapsed cervical cancer with programmed death ligand 1 positivity and relapsed solid tumors with mismatch repair deficiency, which applies to 30% of endometrial cancers. Together, these therapies represent the advent of personalized medicine in gynecologic malignancies. Additional information is required to determine cost-effective strategies for incorporating these therapies and rational means of sequencing these agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.