ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2019
Endothelin-1 in hypertensive patients with ischemic heart disease.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is circulating endothelin evaluation useful for clinicians?Internal and emergency medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was aimed at evaluating whether transient dipyridamole-induced myocardial ischemia in hypertensive patients reflects on endothelin-1 plasma levels by comparing normotensives and hypertensives with or without stable angina. Endothelin-1 plasma levels were assessed in baseline conditions and after provocative stress test by dipyridamole. Four groups of ten age- and sex-matched subjects were retrospectively considered among patients referred for chest pain evaluation and submitted to high-dose Dipyridamole Echocardiographic-Scintigraphic combined test (DES). On the basis of DES results we considered: (1) control normotensives subjects; (2) essential hypertensives (for both groups negative result of DES); (3) essential hypertensives with stable angina; and (4) normotensives with stable angina (for both groups concordant DES detection of myocardial ischemia). Our data showed a marked post-DES increase of endothelin-1 plasma levels in hypertensives with stable angina (mean levels = 16.50 ± 4.19 pg/ml p < 0.001 vs. baseline = 9.05 ± 1.37 pg/ml) and a minor increase in stable angina pts (mean levels = 8.3 ± 1.75 pg/ml p < 0.01 vs. baseline = 6.74 ± 0.61 pg/ml) whereas non significant increase was observed both in control (mean levels = 5.09 ± 0.83 pg/ml p = n.s. vs. baseline = 4.91 ± 1.04 pg/ml) and hypertensives groups (mean levels = 6.34 ± 1.72 pg/ml p = n.s. vs. baseline = 5.95 ± 1.04 pg/ml). ET-1 involvement in hypertension-related ischemic heart disease patho-physiology appears to be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.