Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31069597›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2020

CO

M Farooq, M A Saeed, M Imran, G M Uddin, M Asim, H Bilal, M R Younas, J M Andresen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

M FarooqResearch Centre for Carbon Solutions, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK. engr.farooq@uet.edu.pk.
M A SaeedDepartment of Chemical and Polymer Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, Faisalabad Campus, Lahore, Pakistan.
M ImranDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
G M UddinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
M AsimDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
H BilalAustralian Centre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
M R YounasSchool of Engineering (SEN), University of Management and Technology (UMT) Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
J M AndresenResearch Centre for Carbon Solutions, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most critical energy and environmental challenge that our planet is facing today is to minimize the dependence on fossil fuels. Carbon dioxide may be of utmost significance as a solution of this issue through realization of carbon neutral energy cycle. Potentially, this could be achieved through the carbon dioxide capture as the urgent response to ongoing climate change. Activated carbon (AC) adsorption is one the most effective, environment friendly and techno-economic process for the carbon capture. In the current research, an electro-conductive-activated carbon was prepared by mixing powdered activated carbon (PAC) with an electro-conductive polymer (ECP). Different ratios of 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 wt% of ECP with PAC were used for the different analyses of activated carbons in a gas mixture of CO

Indexed as

Carbon DioxideSustainable DevelopmentAdsorptionCharcoalElectric ConductivityEquipment DesignGasesPolymersCarbon DioxideCharcoalGasesPolymersActivated carbonCarbon captureElectro-conductive polymersPhysical adsorptionSustainable development

Identifiers

PMID31069597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.