Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31069585›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2019

Temporal dynamics of peripheral neutrophil and lymphocytes following acute ischemic stroke.

Ashley B Petrone, Rhae D Eisenman, Kelsey N Steele, Lindsey T Mosmiller, Ogaga Urhie, Matthew J Zdilla

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ashley B PetroneDepartment of Pathology, Anatomy, and Laboratory Medicine, West Virginia University, One Medical Center Drive, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA. abpetrone@hsc.wvu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0632-8472
Rhae D EisenmanWest Virginia University School of Medicine, One Medical Center Drive, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.
Kelsey N SteeleWest Virginia University School of Medicine, One Medical Center Drive, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.
Lindsey T MosmillerWest Virginia University School of Medicine, One Medical Center Drive, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.
Ogaga UrhieWest Virginia University School of Medicine, One Medical Center Drive, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.
Matthew J ZdillaDepartment of Pathology, Anatomy, and Laboratory Medicine, West Virginia University, One Medical Center Drive, Morgantown, WV, 26506, USA.
West Virginia University · US

Funding

West Virginia IDEA-CTRU54GM104942 · NIGMS · WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY · PI Sally Lynn Hodder · 2012 to 2026
$81.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe immune response to acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is implicated in diagnosis, prognosis, and intervention; however, the temporal dynamics of leukocytes following AIS are poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to characterize peripheral leukocyte dynamics following AIS among individuals with poor and favorable outcomes.

methodsA retrospective chart review was conducted among patients with a diagnosis of AIS who were treated at a comprehensive stroke center across a 3-year timeframe. Groups were defined according to stroke outcomes. Patients with poor outcomes were distinguished from those with favorable outcomes by discharge National Institute of Health Stroke Score, infarct size, and Modified Rankin Scale. Leukocyte counts were compared among controls and AIS outcome groups.

resultsThe neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) calculated at 48-72 h post-AIS was identified as the strongest predictor of outcome. NLR was significantly higher in the poor outcome group (8.68 ± 0.93) compared with both the favorable outcome (4.5 ± 0.51, p = 0.009) and control group (4.33 ± 0.66, p < 0.001). Patients with a 48-72 h NLR ≥ 4.58 were 5.58 times more likely to have a poor outcome than AIS patients with an NLR < 4.58.

conclusionsThe results of this study improve the understanding of the immune response in AIS. Low neutrophil count relative to high lymphocyte count at 48-72 h post-AIS should be considered a predictor of a favorable stroke outcome. Conversely, high neutrophil count relative to low lymphocyte count at 48-72 h post-AIS should be considered a predictor of a poor stroke outcome.

Indexed as

LymphocytesNeutrophilsAgedAged, 80 and overBrain InfarctionBrain IschemiaFemaleHumansLeukocyte CountLymphocyte CountMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePrognosisRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexImmuneLeukocyteNeutrophilNeutrophil-lymphocyte ratioStroke

Identifiers

PMID31069585
PMCPMC7898194
OpenAlexW2944615405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.