Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31069521›Full record

ArticlePlanta2019

The distribution of epigenetic histone marks differs between the X and Y chromosomes in Silene latifolia.

Václav Bačovský, Andreas Houben, Katrin Kumke, Roman Hobza

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sexy ways: approaches to studying plant sex chromosomes.Journal of experimental botany · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Dosage compensation evolution in plants: theories, controversies and mechanisms.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. The Sister Chromatid Division of the Heteromorphic Sex Chromosomes inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Epigenetics drive the evolution of sex chromosomes in animals and plants.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. The Formation of Sex Chromosomes inFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Václav BačovskýDepartment of Plant Developmental Genetics, Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Kralovopolska 135, 612 65, Brno, Czech Republic. xbacovs@ibp.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7621-8936
Andreas HoubenLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Corrensstrasse 3, Gatersleben, 06466, Germany.
Katrin KumkeLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Corrensstrasse 3, Gatersleben, 06466, Germany.
Roman HobzaDepartment of Plant Developmental Genetics, Institute of Biophysics of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Kralovopolska 135, 612 65, Brno, Czech Republic. hobza@ibp.cz.
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics · CZLeibniz-Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung (IPK) · DE

Funding

Grantová Agentura České Republiky 16-08698SGrantová Agentura České Republiky 18-06147S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionContrasting patterns of histone modifications between the X and Y chromosome in Silene latifolia show euchromatic histone mark depletion on the Y chromosome and indicate hyperactivation of one X chromosome in females. Silene latifolia (white campion) is a dioecious plant with heteromorphic sex chromosomes (24, XX in females and 24, XY in males), and a genetically degenerated Y chromosome that is 1.4 times larger than the X chromosome. Although the two sex chromosomes differ in their DNA content, information about epigenetic histone marks and evidence of their function are scarce. We performed immunolabeling experiments using antibodies specific for active and suppressive histone modifications as well as pericentromere-specific histone modifications. We show that the Y chromosome is partially depleted of histone modifications important for transcriptionally active chromatin, and carries these marks only in the pseudo-autosomal region, but that it is not enriched for suppressive and pericentromere histone marks. We also show that two of the active marks are specifically enriched in one of the X chromosomes in females and in the X chromosome in males. Our data support recent findings that genetic imprinting mediates dosage compensation of sex chromosomes in S. latifolia.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticChromosomes, PlantHistone CodeSilenePosttranslational histone modificationsPseudo-autosomal regionSex chromosomes

Identifiers

PMID31069521
OpenAlexW2944806558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.