Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31069449›Full record

ReviewDer Orthopade2019

[Etiology and significance of growth disturbances of the spine].

D Studer, C Hasler

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Orthopade, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

D StuderUniversitätskinderspital beider Basel, UKBB, Spitalstrasse 33, 4056, Basel, Schweiz. daniel.studer@ukbb.ch.
C HaslerUniversitätskinderspital beider Basel, UKBB, Spitalstrasse 33, 4056, Basel, Schweiz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe majority of growth disturbances of the spine are acquired and their etiology is still unknown. Both scolioses and sagittal profile disorders are most commonly of idiopathic origin. ETIOLOGY: The etiology is multifactorial and besides genetic, hormonal and mechanical factors also metabolic components seem to be involved. The risk of progression of an existing deformity is particularly high during the pubertal growth spurt. Accordingly, regular clinical and radiological controls should be carried out in this vulnerable period. Recently, spinal deformities have been classified according to the time of diagnosis rather than according to their etiology, considering the increasing knowledge about the correlation between spinal and thoracic growth and the associated maturation of the lungs. Therefore, the term "early onset scoliosis" considers all deformities of the spine diagnosed before the age of 10 years. TREATMENT: In the case of failure of conservative treatment options, which have to be applied for as long as possible, definitive spinal fusion surgery should be delayed by the use of growth-sparing surgical techniques, aiming to achieve as normal pulmonary function as possible.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionHumansRadiographyScoliosisSpinal DiseasesSpineConservative therapyScheuermann’s diseaseScoliosisSpinal deformitiesSpondylodesis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.