ReviewDer Radiologe2019
[Mothership or drip and ship?]
Review in Der Radiologe, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transferring neurointerventionalists saves time compared with interhospital transfer of stroke patients for endovascular thrombectomy: a collaborative pooled analysis of 1001 patients (EVEREST).Journal of neurointerventional surgery · 2023Observational
- New Prehospital Triage for Stroke Patients Significantly Reduces Transport Time of EVT Patients Without Delaying IVT.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- Direct Admission vs. Secondary Transfer to a Comprehensive Stroke Center for Thrombectomy : Retrospective Analysis of a Regional Stroke Registry with 2797 Patients.Clinical neuroradiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe scientific evidence of the high efficacy of endovascular stroke treatment in large vessel occlusion (LVO) led to this treatment being accepted as the gold standard in these patients.
objectiveThis review article presents the various organizational models for thrombectomy and analyzes which model is preferred under which circumstances. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn an analysis of the recent scientific literature the models for optimizing patient transport (drip and ship or mothership) and optimizing the availability of interventionalists (drip and drive or remote mentoring) are presented and compared. In addition, considerations are made on thrombectomy rates and the prevalence of LVOs and the construction of organizational models.
resultsIf the location of the stroke patient is just as far from or closer to a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) than a primary stroke center (PSC), the patient should be transported directly to the CSC by mothership. If, on the other hand, a PSC is closer to the stroke site than a CSC and the time after the onset of symptoms lies within the lysis time window, this decision depends on many variables.
conclusionBased on the unambiguous data situation, no recommendations can currently be made for a generally superior organizational model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.