ArticleHNO2019
[Nasal provocation with increased ASA dose: improved "non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)-exacerbated disease" (N‑ERD) detection rate in chronic rhinosinusitis patients].
Article in HNO, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- [Importance of aspirin challenges in patients with NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease].HNO · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnalgesic intolerance (AI) is an important diagnostic feature of disease progression in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) accompanied by nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and asthma.
objectiveThe aim of the present study was to determine whether increasing the concentration of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) used in the diagnostic nasal challenge would improve detection of ASA intolerance (NSAIDs-exacerbated respiratory disease, N‑ERD).
methodsPatients with CRSwNP, asthma, and with (CRSwNP-AAI, n = 20) or without (CRSwNP-A, n = 15) anamnestically reported AI, as well as control subjects with CRS but no nasal polyps, asthma, or AI (n = 15), were challenged nasally with 16 mg ASA and, in case of a negative result, with 25 mg of ASA.
resultsIn CRSwNP-AAI subjects, the challenge with 16 mg ASA resulted in detection of AI in 80% of cases; increasing the challenge of ASA to 25 mg improved the AI detection to 95%. In CRSwNP-A subjects, the detection of AI increased from 40% (16 mg ASA) to 53% (25 mg ASA). In the control group, no reaction to nasal ASA challenge was detected. No difference in the diagnosis of positive reactions after provocation was found when using the German vs. the European recommended evaluation criteria. Mild pulmonary symptoms occurred in 2 (10%) CRSwNP-AAI patients following the 16 mg ASA challenge.
conclusionIn patients with CRSwNP, asthma, and anamnestic AI, nasal provocation can effectively confirm the diagnosis of N‑ERD and can also be recommended for patients with recurrent CRSwNP and asthma but without reported AI. Increasing the ASA challenge to 25 mg increases the overall detection rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.