ArticleAPL bioengineering2018
Nonlinear electrocardiographic imaging using polynomial approximation networks.
Article in APL bioengineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review of computational techniques, dataset utilization, and feature extraction in electrocardiographic imaging.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2025Pooled it
- Hybrid Neural State-Space Modeling for Supervised and Unsupervised Electrocardiographic Imaging.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2024Article
- Electrocardiographic Imaging for Atrial Fibrillation: A Perspective From Computer Models and Animal Experiments to Clinical Value.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Review
- Bioengineering of the heart.APL bioengineering · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrocardiography is a valuable tool to aid in medical understanding and treatment of heart-related ailments, specifically atrial fibrillation (AF) and other irregular cardiac behavior. Although signs of AF will manifest in conventional electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings, interpretation and localization of AF sources require significant clinical expertise. In this vein, electrocardiographic imaging has emerged as an important medical imaging modality that provides reconstructions of the heart's electrical activity from non-invasive multi-lead body-surface ECG and anatomical x-ray computed tomography images. In this paper, we present a nonlinear inversion model for computing this mapping to improve upon the reconstruction performance of current methods. While contemporary techniques typically determine an inverse solution by discretizing and inverting an underdetermined linear system of partial differential equations governing the relationship between voltage potentials of the heart and torso, the presented technique re-casts this problem as a task in function approximation and provides a direct parameterization of the inverse operator using a polynomial neural network. That is, the outlined nonlinear inversion technique is a generalization of contemporary reconstruction techniques which allows geometrical and material parameterizations of the forward-model to be optimized using real experimental data collected from patients suffering from AF, as to better represent the inverse operator with respect to reconstruction metrics applicable to electrophysiology. The accuracy of our model is evaluated against a dataset of real-patient recordings to demonstrate its validity, and mathematical analysis is provided to support the polynomial expansion used in our inversion model.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.