Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31069295›Full record

ReviewAPL bioengineering2018

Review: Bioengineering strategies to probe T cell mechanobiology.

Adi de la Zerda, Michael J Kratochvil, Nicholas A Suhar, Sarah C Heilshorn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in APL bioengineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Modeling Immunity In Vitro: Slices, Chips, and Engineered Tissues.Annual review of biomedical engineering · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Focus on mechano-immunology: new direction in cancer treatment.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  6. Induction and Assessment of Activation in Rat Effector CD4Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Tuning immunity through tissue mechanotransduction.Nature reviews. Immunology · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Quantifying Immune Cell Force Generation Using Traction Force Microscopy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Adi de la ZerdaDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Michael J Kratochvil
Nicholas A SuharDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Sarah C HeilshornDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.

Funding

Stanford/UNC Biomimetic U19 Research CenterU19AI116484 · NIAID · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KUO, CALVIN J · 2015 to 2025
$13.5M
Graduate Training Program in BiotechnologyT32GM008412 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI COCHRAN, JENNIFER R · 1991 to 2020
$5.5M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI116484NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T cells play a major role in adaptive immune response, and T cell dysfunction can lead to the progression of several diseases that are often associated with changes in the mechanical properties of tissues. However, the concept that mechanical forces play a vital role in T cell activation and signaling is relatively new. The endogenous T cell microenvironment is highly complex and dynamic, involving multiple, simultaneous cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions. This native complexity has made it a challenge to isolate the effects of mechanical stimuli on T cell activation. In response, researchers have begun developing engineered platforms that recapitulate key aspects of the native microenvironment to dissect these complex interactions in order to gain a better understanding of T cell mechanotransduction. In this review, we first describe some of the unique characteristics of T cells and the mounting research that has shown they are mechanosensitive. We then detail the specific bioengineering strategies that have been used to date to measure and perturb the mechanical forces at play during T cell activation. In addition, we look at engineering strategies that have been used successfully in mechanotransduction studies for other cell types and describe adaptations that may make them suitable for use with T cells. These engineering strategies can be classified as 2D, so-called 2.5D, or 3D culture systems. In the future, findings from this emerging field will lead to an optimization of culture environments for T cell expansion and the development of new T cell immunotherapies for cancer and other immune diseases.

Identifiers

PMID31069295
PMCPMC6324202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.