ArticleFrontiers in medicine2019
Patient Preference Studies During Early Drug Development: Aligning Stakeholders to Ensure Development Plans Meet Patient Needs.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Review
- Patient awareness, involvement, and learning needs in health technology assessment - a survey of patients, caregivers, and patient advocates.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2025Article
- Developing Tools for the Efficient Design of Health Preference Studies: Taxonomy of Attributes and Prototype of an Attribute Library.The patient · 2025Review
- Global research on patient involvement in health technology assessment: a bibliometric analysis.Global health research and policy · 2025Article
- Designing a Patient Preference Study on Subcutaneous Medical Devices: Incorporating Health Authority Scientific Advice and Patient Perspectives.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2025Article
- Patient Perspectives on a Digital Therapeutic for Schizophrenia: A Qualitative Evaluation of an App for Negative Symptoms.Schizophrenia bulletin open · 2025Article
- Patient Preferences for Features Associated With Leadless Versus Conventional Transvenous Cardiac Pacemakers.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2024Article
- Development of a disease-specific health utility score for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from a discrete choice experiment patient preference study.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2024Article
- One size fits all: Enhanced zero-shot text classification for patient listening on social media.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy European Patient Survey: Assessing Patient Reported Disease Burden and Preferences in Clinical Trial Participation.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2024Article
- Patient Acceptability and Preferences for Solid Oral Dosage Form Drug Product Attributes: A Scoping Review.Patient preference and adherence · 2024Article
- Using social media research in health technology assessment: stakeholder perspectives and scoping review.International journal of technology assessment in health care · 2023Article
- Adaptation of the WOMAC for Use in a Patient Preference Study.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2023Article
- Patient-Centric Design of Topical Dermatological Medicines.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Clinical Trial Design Challenges and Opportunities for Emerging Treatments for Opioid Use Disorder: A Review.JAMA psychiatry · 2023Review
- How can patient preferences be used and communicated in the regulatory evaluation of medicinal products? Findings and recommendations from IMI PREFER and call to action.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Prioritization and Refinement of Patient-Informed Value Elements as Attributes for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Treatment Preferences.The patient · 2021Article
- Patient Preferences in Rare Diseases: A Qualitative Study in Neuromuscular Disorders to Inform a Quantitative Preference Study.The patient · 2021Article
- Investigating Patients' Preferences to Inform Drug Development Decisions: Novel Insights from a Discrete Choice Experiment in Migraine.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although patient preferences have been studied broadly for marketed products or around the time of submission to authorities and launch, patient preference studies have rarely been used during the early drug development phases. In this paper, we formulate three hypotheses supporting the use of patient preference studies in early product development: (1) integration of the patient perspective into the development process from phase 1 onwards will result in healthcare solutions with outcomes that best address patients' needs; (2) a structured process to build patient-based evidence involving partnerships between patients and other key stakeholders will improve alignment of development activities with the needs of patients; (3) quantitative patient preference research built on robust qualitative insights is necessary to strengthen development decisions in the interests of patients. To illustrate such a structured process, we describe qualitative insights research (social media analysis and online bulletin boards) and quantitative patient preference studies in dry eye disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis conducted during early product development by a pharmaceutical company to generate patient-based evidence. The outputs from such early patient preference studies are being used to inform patient reported outcome strategies, clinical development strategies, product design and delivery features, and form the basis for early dialog with regulators, health technology assessment (HTA) bodies and payers to ensure focus and alignment on patient-relevant endpoints. Furthermore, to discuss and theoretically substantiate our hypotheses, we review how different groups and organizations are working to embrace fully the patient perspective in product development and healthcare decision-making. The hypotheses are commensurate with the general trend toward patient-centered healthcare and the activities initiated by regulators, HTA agencies, and patient organizations. We advocate that all healthcare players should actively contribute to aligning on best practices concerning choice of methodologies and engage in multi-stakeholder dialog along the entire product development chain, to realize health technologies that best meet the needs of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.