Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31069113›Full record

ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2019

A yield-cost tradeoff governs

Matteo Mori, Enzo Marinari, Andrea De Martino

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cellular perception of growth rate and the mechanistic origin of bacterial growth law.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Matteo Mori1Department of Physics, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA.
Enzo Marinari *2Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro 2, Rome, 00185 Italy.
Andrea De Martino *4Soft & Living Matter Lab, Institute of Nanotechnology (CNR-NANOTEC), c/o Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro 2, Rome, 00185 Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Quantitative Studies of Metabolic Switches in enteric bacteriaR01GM109069 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HWA, TERENCE · 2014 to 2022
$3.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Living cells react to changes in growth conditions by re-shaping their proteome. This accounts for different stress-response strategies, both specific (i.e., aimed at increasing the availability of stress-mitigating proteins) and systemic (such as large-scale changes in the use of metabolic pathways aimed at a more efficient exploitation of resources). Proteome re-allocation can, however, imply significant biosynthetic costs. Whether and how such costs impact the growth performance are largely open problems. Focusing on carbon-limited

Indexed as

CarbonCell ProliferationCell RespirationEnergy MetabolismEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsFermentationMetabolic Networks and PathwaysModels, BiologicalProteomeProteomicsCarbonEscherichia coli ProteinsProteomeBiochemical networksBioenergeticsSystems analysis

Identifiers

PMID31069113
PMCPMC6494807
OpenAlexW2962760960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.