ArticleJournal of hip preservation surgery2019
Hip labral reconstruction: consensus study on indications, graft type and technique among high-volume surgeons.
Article in Journal of hip preservation surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.
- The dimensions of the hip labrum can be reliably measured using magnetic resonance and computed tomography which can be used to develop a standardized definition of the hypoplastic labrum.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021Pooled it
- Indications and Outcomes for Arthroscopic Hip Labral Reconstruction With Autografts: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in surgery · 2020Pooled it
- Arthroscopic Segmental Labral Reconstruction Using a Presutured Iliotibial Band Allograft Soaked in Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate.Arthroscopy techniques · 2026Article
- Graft Height and Labral Integrity as Key Determinants of Suction Seal Restoration in Hip Labral Augmentation: Findings From an Ovine Model.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Estimation of safe zones for suture anchor placement in arthroscopic hip labral repair.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Age is not necessarily a determinant: labral reconstruction of the hip demonstrates improved patient-reported outcomes in adults aged 60 years and older.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2026Article
- Protected Weight-Bearing and Early Passive Mobilization Are Common Components of Rehabilitation After Hip Arthroscopy With Labral Reconstruction.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2025Review
- Arthroscopic Hip Labral Reconstruction With Fresh Meniscal Allograft.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
- Hip Labral Repair versus Reconstruction: Meta-analysis.Hip & pelvis · 2024Review
- A comprehensive review of hip arthroscopy techniques and outcomes.SAGE open medicine · 2024Review
- Recovery After Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Combined Femoroacetabular Impingement and Labral Tears Compared With Isolated Pathology.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2023Article
- It's not arthritis! Resolution of the illusion of joint space narrowing with acetabuloplasty and labral reconstruction for the calcified labrum.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2022Article
- Outcomes and Return-to-Sport Rates for Elite Athletes With Femoral Retroversion Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy: A Propensity-Matched Analysis With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2022Article
- Allograft Labral Reconstruction of the Hip: Expanding Evidence Supporting Greater Utilization in Hip Arthroscopy.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2022Review
- Favorable Outcomes of Revision Hip Arthroscopy Irrespective of Whether Index Surgery was Performed by the Same Surgeon or a Different Surgeon.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2021Article
- Arthroscopic Triple Reconstruction in the Hip Joint: Restoration of Soft-Tissue Stabilizers in Revision Surgery for Gross Instability.Arthroscopy techniques · 2021Article
- Graft Options in Hip Labral Reconstruction.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2021Review
- [Research progress in arthroscopic treatment of acetabular labrum injury].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2020Article
- Arthroscopic acetabular labral reconstruction: a review.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2020Review
- Consensus-based classification system for intra-operative management of labral tears during hip arthroscopy-aggregate recommendations from high-volume hip preservation surgeons.Journal of hip preservation surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To survey high-volume hip arthroscopists regarding their current indications for labral reconstruction, graft preference and technique. In May 2018, a cross-sectional based survey was conducted on high-volume hip arthroscopists. A high-volume surgeon was defined as an orthopaedist who had case experience ranging from 50 to 5000 hip arthroscopies performed annually. The survey included their current indications for labral reconstruction, graft preference and technique. Twelve high-volume surgeons successfully completed the questionnaire. The mean arthroscopic procedures performed by the surgeons annually was 188.7 (range 60-350). Four surgeons (33.3%) performed <5 labral reconstruction cases per year, three (25.0%) 5-10 cases per year, two (16.7%) 11-15 cases per year and three (25.0%) over 20 cases per year. Of the 12 surgeons, 11 (91.6%) would reconstruct in certain primary settings and 100% would reconstruct in revision settings. In the primary setting, the main indications for reconstruction were poor quality labral tissue, calcified labrum and hypoplastic labrum. None of the surgeons recommended labral reconstruction for reparable labral tears in primary cases. In primary cases of irreparable labra, 58.3% of the surgeons favoured reconstruction over debridement. In revisions, 100% of the surgeon favoured reconstruction over debridement; 91.7% chose an allograft option versus an autograft alternative. Amongst high-volume arthroscopists, labral reconstruction was considered a valuable technique to restore labral function. Labral reconstruction was more often advocated in revision than in primary settings. Allograft was the preferred choice for reconstruction. Excision of the labral tissue prior to reconstruction was favoured over augmentation. Fewer surgeons performed circumferential reconstruction than segmental reconstruction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.