Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31069047›Full record

ArticleF1000Research2017

META-pipe cloud setup and execution.

Aleksandr Agafonov, Kimmo Mattila, Cuong Duong Tuan, Lars Tiede, Inge Alexander Raknes, Lars Ailo Bongo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000Research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aleksandr AgafonovDepartment of Computer Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Kimmo MattilaCSC - IT Center for Science, Espoo, 02150, Finland.
Cuong Duong TuanCESNET, Prague 6, 160 00 , Czech Republic.
Lars TiedeDepartment of Information Technology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Inge Alexander RaknesDepartment of Chemistry, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Lars Ailo BongoDepartment of Computer Science, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7544-2482

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

META-pipe is a complete service for the analysis of marine metagenomic data. It provides assembly of high-throughput sequence data, functional annotation of predicted genes, and taxonomic profiling. The functional annotation is computationally demanding and is therefore currently run on a high-performance computing cluster in Norway. However, additional compute resources are necessary to open the service to all ELIXIR users. We describe our approach for setting up and executing the functional analysis of META-pipe on additional academic and commercial clouds. Our goal is to provide a powerful analysis service that is easy to use and to maintain. Our design therefore uses a distributed architecture where we combine central servers with multiple distributed backends that execute the computationally intensive jobs. We believe our experiences developing and operating META-pipe provides a useful model for others that plan to provide a portal based data analysis service in ELIXIR and other organizations with geographically distributed compute and storage resources.

Indexed as

AAI federationAmazon Web ServicesApache SparkEGI Federated CloudELIXIRMETA-pipeOpenStackPortability

Identifiers

PMID31069047
PMCPMC6480938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.