Articlei-Perception
Psychophysical Tests Do Not Identify Ocular Dominance Consistently.
Article in i-Perception. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07697131 (A Comparative Study of Fusional Vergence According to Ocular Dominance in Healthy Subjects), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Comparative Study of Fusional Vergence According to Ocular Dominance in Healthy Subjects
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dichoptic Perceptual Training and Sensory Eye Dominance Plasticity in Normal Vision.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021Trial
- Psychometric functions for temporal discrimination: Duration or log duration?Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Retinal-Specificity of Sensory Eye Dominance and Its Learning-Induced Improvements.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Assessing Ocular Dominance: Rethinking the Current Paradigm.Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2025Article
- The neurochemistry of learning-driven sensory eye dominance plasticity.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Monovision Correction Preference and Eye Dominance Measurements.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Article
- Measuring the impact of suppression on visual acuity in children with amblyopia using a dichoptic visual acuity chart.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Classical sighting or sensory tests are used in clinical practice to identify the dominant eye. Several psychophysical tests were recently proposed to quantify the magnitude of dominance but whether their results agree was never investigated. We addressed this question for the two most common psychophysical tests: The
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.