Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31068960›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2019

Gamete Nuclear Migration in Animals and Plants.

Umma Fatema, Mohammad F Ali, Zheng Hu, Anthony J Clark, Tomokazu Kawashima

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nuclear Fusion in Yeast and Plant Reproduction.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. ARP2/3-independent WAVE/SCAR pathway and class XI myosin control sperm nuclear migration in flowering plants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Umma FatemaDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
Mohammad F AliDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
Zheng HuDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
Anthony J ClarkDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
Tomokazu KawashimaDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States.
University of Kentucky · USPlant (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The migration of male and female gamete nuclei to each other in the fertilized egg is a prerequisite for the blending of genetic materials and the initiation of the next generation. Interestingly, many differences have been found in the mechanism of gamete nuclear movement among animals and plants. Female to male gamete nuclear movement in animals and brown algae relies on microtubules. By contrast, in flowering plants, the male gamete nucleus is carried to the female gamete nucleus by the filamentous actin cytoskeleton. As techniques have developed from light, electron, fluorescence, immunofluorescence, and confocal microscopy to live-cell time-lapse imaging using fluorescently labeled proteins, details of these differences in gamete nuclear migration have emerged in a wide range of eukaryotes. Especially, gamete nuclear migration in flowering plants such as

Indexed as

cytoskeletonF-actinfertilizationgamete nuclear migrationmicrotubulesexual reproduction

Identifiers

PMID31068960
PMCPMC6491811
OpenAlexW2941121000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.