Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31068924›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2019

Stage of Gestation at Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Infection of Pregnant Swine Impacts Maternal Immunity and Lactogenic Immune Protection of Neonatal Suckling Piglets.

Stephanie N Langel, Francine C Paim, Moyasar A Alhamo, Alexandra Buckley, Albert Van Geelen, Kelly M Lager, Anastasia N Vlasova, Linda J Saif

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Veterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie N LangelFood Animal Health Research Program, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, College of Food, Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, United States.
Francine C PaimFood Animal Health Research Program, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, College of Food, Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, United States.
Moyasar A AlhamoFood Animal Health Research Program, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, College of Food, Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, United States.
Alexandra BuckleyNational Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Ames, IA, United States.
Albert Van GeelenNational Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Ames, IA, United States.
Kelly M LagerNational Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Ames, IA, United States.
Anastasia N VlasovaFood Animal Health Research Program, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, College of Food, Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, United States.
Linda J SaifFood Animal Health Research Program, Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, College of Food, Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, United States.
The Ohio State University · USNational Animal Disease Center · USAgricultural Research Service · US

Funding

USDA 60054098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During pregnancy, the maternal immune response changes dramatically over the course of gestation. This has implications for generation of lactogenic immunity and subsequent protection in suckling neonates against enteric viral infections. For example, porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) is an alphacoronavirus that causes acute diarrhea in neonatal piglets. Due to the high virulence of PEDV and the naïve, immature immune system of neonatal suckling piglets, passive lactogenic immunity to PEDV induced during pregnancy, via the gut-mammary gland (MG)-secretory IgA (sIgA) axis, is critical for piglet protection. However, the anti-PEDV immune response during pregnancy and stage of gestation required to optimally stimulate the gut-MG-sIgA axis is undefined. We hypothesize that there is a gestational window in which non-lethal PEDV infection of pregnant gilts influences maximum lymphocyte mucosal trafficking to the MG, resulting in optimal passive lactogenic protection in suckling piglets. To understand how the stages of gestation affect maternal immune responses to PEDV, three groups of gilts were orally infected with PEDV in the first, second or third trimester. Control (mock) gilts were inoculated with medium in the third trimester. To determine if lactogenic immunity correlated with protection, all piglets were PEDV-challenged at 3-5 days postpartum. PEDV infection of gilts at different stages of gestation significantly affected multiple maternal systemic immune parameters prepartum, including cytokines, B cells, PEDV antibodies (Abs), and PEDV antibody secreting cells (ASCs). Pregnant second trimester gilts had significantly higher levels of circulating PEDV IgA and IgG Abs and ASCs and PEDV virus neutralizing (VN) Abs post PEDV infection. Coinciding with the significantly higher PEDV Ab responses in second trimester gilts, the survival rate of their PEDV-challenged piglets was 100%, compared with 87.2, 55.9, and 5.7% for first, third, and mock litters, respectively. Additionally, piglet survival positively correlated with PEDV IgA Abs and ASCs and VN Abs in milk and PEDV IgA and IgG Abs in piglet serum. Our findings have implications for gestational timing of oral attenuated PEDV maternal vaccines, whereby PEDV intestinal infection in the second trimester optimally stimulated the gut-MG-sIgA axis resulting in 100% lactogenic immune protection in suckling piglets.

Indexed as

Immunity, Maternally-AcquiredAnimalsAnimals, NewbornAntibodies, ViralBiomarkersB-LymphocytesCoronavirus InfectionsCytokinesFemaleGestational AgeHost-Pathogen InteractionsImmunity, InnateImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GMilkOrgan SpecificityAntibodies, ViralBiomarkersCytokinesImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin Ggut-mammary-secretory IgA axislactogenic immunityPEDVpregnancyswine

Identifiers

PMID31068924
PMCPMC6491507
OpenAlexW2942381670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.