Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31068763›Full record

ArticleThe arabidopsis book2017

Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation: biology and applications.

Hau-Hsuan Hwang, Manda Yu, Erh-Min Lai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The arabidopsis book, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 130 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
130citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

130 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Establishment of an efficientFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Enhancing enzyme activity of heterologously expressed Chit42 inBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

70 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hau-Hsuan HwangDepartment of Life Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan, 402.
Manda YuInstitute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, 115.
Erh-Min LaiInstitute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, 115.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant genetic transformation heavily relies on the bacterial pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens as a powerful tool to deliver genes of interest into a host plant. Inside the plant nucleus, the transferred DNA is capable of integrating into the plant genome for inheritance to the next generation (i.e. stable transformation). Alternatively, the foreign DNA can transiently remain in the nucleus without integrating into the genome but still be transcribed to produce desirable gene products (i.e. transient transformation). From the discovery of A. tumefaciens to its wide application in plant biotechnology, numerous aspects of the interaction between A. tumefaciens and plants have been elucidated. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of the biology and the applications of Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation, which may be useful for both microbiologists and plant biologists who desire a better understanding of plant transformation, protein expression in plants, and plant-microbe interaction.

Identifiers

PMID31068763
PMCPMC6501860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.