ReviewClinical medicine insights. Reproductive health2019
Review in Clinical medicine insights. Reproductive health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fertility Preservation in Female Patients with Cancer. Part III: Royan Human Ovarian Tissue Bank Guideline for Prepubertal Girls and Women, A Review.International journal of fertility & sterility · 2026Article
- Development of medical freezing measures in women during the last decade from 2014 to 2023: registry data of the tri-national network FertiPROTEKT.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2026Article
- Cryopreservation of ovarian tissue - what's known so far and future perspectives.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Review
- Guidelines, Counseling Practices, and Fertility Preservation Options for Childhood Cancer Patients in the Nordic-Baltic Region.JCO oncology practice · 2025Article
- Fertility preservation in females requiring gonadotoxic therapy should be more than freezing measures before therapy - secondary fertility preservation and menopause care management after therapy should also be considered.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2025Review
- Engineering strategies and challenges in building the follicular microenvironment for a bioprosthetic ovary.Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology · 2025Review
- Trends in fertility preservation treatments in Japan until 2023: analysis of the Japan Oncofertility Registry.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Fertility preservation: is there a model for gender-dysphoric youth?Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
- Thawing fertility: a view of ovarian tissue cryopreservation processes and review of ovarian transplant research.Fertility and sterility · 2024Review
- Fertility preservation service for children and young adults at high risk of infertility; the hub and spoke model.Pediatric surgery international · 2024Article
- Efficient pathway for men fertility preservation in testicular cancer or lymphoma: a cross-sectional study of national 2018 data.Basic and clinical andrology · 2023Article
- [Indication and implementation of fertility preservation measures in female cancer patients].Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- National oncofertility registries around the globe: a pilot survey.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- Installing oncofertility programs for breast cancer in limited versus optimum resource settings: Empirical data from 39 surveyed centers in Repro-Can-OPEN Study Part I & II.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2022Article
- Ovarian transplantation with robotic surgery and a neovascularizing human extracellular matrix scaffold: a case series in comparison to meta-analytic data.Fertility and sterility · 2022Article
- Comparison between two cryopreservation techniques of human ovarian cortex: morphological aspects and the heat shock response (HSR).Cell stress & chaperones · 2021Article
- Installing oncofertility programs for common cancers in optimum resource settings (Repro-Can-OPEN Study Part II): a committee opinion.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021Article
- Oncofertility Knowledge and Communication: Comparison Between Medical and Surgical Oncologists and Breast Cancer Patients in Academic Chinese Centers.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Article
- Recent advances: fertility preservation and fertility restoration options for males and females.Faculty reviews · 2021Review
- Integration of partners of young women with cancer in oncofertility evidence-based informational resources.Cancer medicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Fertility preservation is an increasingly important discipline. It requires close coordination between reproductive medicine specialists, reproductive biologists, and oncologists in various disciplines. In addition, it represents a particular health policy challenge, since fertility-protection measures are to be understood as a treatment for side effects of gonadotoxic treatments and would therefore normally have to be reimbursed by health insurance companies. Therefore, it is inevitable that fertility-preservation activities should organise themselves into a network structure both as a medical-logistic network and as a professional medical society. The necessary network structures can differ significantly at regional, national, and international level, as the size of the regions to be integrated and the local cultural and geographical conditions, as well as the political conditions are very different. To address these issues, the current review aims to point out the basic importance and the chances but also the difficulties of fertility-protection networks and give practical guidance for the development of such network structures. We will not only discuss network structures theoretically but also present them based on three established, different sized networks, such as the Danish Network (www.rigshospitalet.dk), representing a centralised network in a small country; the German-Austrian-Swiss network
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.