Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31068689›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2020

Comparison of clinician and patient users of a mobile phone application to assess penile curvature in Peyronie's disease.

Wayne G Brisbane, Marc J Rogers, Ryan S Hsi, Saneal Rajanahally, George R Schade, Lauren Trew, Kevin A Ostrowski, Hunter Wessells, Thomas J Walsh

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of impotence research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. A model for digital innovations in sexual medicine.International journal of impotence research · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wayne G BrisbaneDepartment of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, UW Medicine Men's Health Center, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0470-5262
Marc J RogersDepartment of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, UW Medicine Men's Health Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ryan S HsiDepartment of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Saneal RajanahallyDepartment of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, UW Medicine Men's Health Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
George R SchadeDepartment of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, UW Medicine Men's Health Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Lauren TrewDepartment of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, UW Medicine Men's Health Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kevin A OstrowskiDepartment of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, UW Medicine Men's Health Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Hunter WessellsDepartment of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, UW Medicine Men's Health Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Thomas J WalshDepartment of Urology, University of Washington School of Medicine, UW Medicine Men's Health Center, Seattle, WA, USA. walsht@uw.edu.
University of Washington · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessment of Peyronie's disease with penile injection is invasive and uncomfortable. We developed a smartphone application (UWPEN) to assess penile angulation in the home environment. The purpose of this study was to compare clinician and patient measurements and assess the patient experience with UWPEN in a clinical setting. We prospectively enrolled patients with Peyronie's disease undergoing intracavernosal injection of alprostadil. Penile angulation and narrowing were then assessed by patients and clinicians using UWPEN and compared to values obtained via a goniometer and a ruler (gold standard). Measurements were compared using the Pearson correlation test. Upon completion of measurements, patients were surveyed regarding the ease of use, confidence with use, and measurement preferences. Twenty patients were enrolled in the study; two patients were excluded for poor penile turgidity after a maximum dosage of intracavernosal alprostadil. Correlation between UWPEN and gold standard measurements by patients and clinicians was R = 0.55 (p = 0.01) and R = 0.87 (p < 0.01) for dorsal measurements, R = 0.62 (p = 0.01) and R = 0.77 (p < 0.01) for lateral measurements, and R = 0.73 (p < 0.01) and R = 0.64 (p < 0.01) for girth measurements, respectively. Prior evaluation of correlation suggests a strong correlation at R = 0.8, and good correlation at R = 0.5. Overall, patients preferred using UWPEN to traditional measurements, and 75% reported UWPEN as their first preference for measurements. UWPEN enables patients to assess their disease severity with good correlation to gold standard measurements. Patients prefer mobile platforms for disease monitoring, and development of technology for disease monitoring should be a priority within the Peyronie's disease research community.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneMobile ApplicationsPenile IndurationAlprostadilHumansMalePenisAlprostadil

Identifiers

PMID31068689
OpenAlexW2944535717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.