Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31068610›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Comparative mode of action of the antimicrobial peptide melimine and its derivative Mel4 against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Muhammad Yasir, Debarun Dutta, Mark D P Willcox

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Antimicrobial activity of a short guanidine mimic immobilised on contact lenses.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The Role ofPharmaceutics · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Muhammad YasirSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. yasirjri85@gmail.com.
Debarun DuttaSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Mark D P WillcoxSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melimine and Mel4 are chimeric cationic peptides with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. They have been shown to be highly biocompatible in animal models and human clinical trials. The current study examined the mechanism of action of these two antimicrobial peptides against P. aeruginosa. The effect of the peptides of endotoxin neutralization, and their interactions with cytoplasmic membranes using DiSC(3)-5 and Sytox green, Syto-9 and PI dyes were analysed. Release of ATP and DNA/RNA were determined using ATP luminescence and increase in OD

Indexed as

Adenosine TriphosphateAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesCell MembraneCell Membrane PermeabilityCell PolarityDNA, BacterialLipid AMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPseudomonas aeruginosaRNA, BacterialAdenosine TriphosphateAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesDNA, BacterialLipid AmelimineRNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID31068610
PMCPMC6506473
OpenAlexW2896498791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.